Editors’ Vox is a blog from AGU’s Publications Department.

The supply of magma from the Earth’s mantle is a primary source of heat to volcanic arc crust, where the heat is then dissipated through various processes. Much of this magmatic heat is dissipated as heated water, or aqueous fluid.

A new article in Reviews of Geophysics compares 11 different volcanic-arc segments where heat discharge via aqueous fluid has been well-inventoried to better understand the factors that influence this process. Here, we asked the authors to give an overview of heat discharge from volcanic arcs, how scientists measure it, and what questions remain.

Why is it important to study how heat is dissipated from volcanic arcs?

Volcanic arcs are the chains of volcanoes on top of subduction zones. They can produce some of Earth’s most explosive and hazardous eruptions. But much of the magma beneath the surface never erupts. Nevertheless, the heat from these magmas—and the simple fact of their existence and abundance—still matters for geothermal energy, patterns of groundwater flow, and the patterns of volcanic activity at the surface.

What are the main modes in which heat is discharged from volcanic arcs?

Heat at volcanic arcs can be carried by magmas, transmitted through the crust conductively, and carried by water seeping slowly through the crust. At the base of the crust, magmas are probably most important, with conduction coming in second. But as magmas move upwards through the crust, some of them solidify and impart their heat to their surroundings where it is transferred by conduction. Within a few kilometers of the surface, fluids seeping through the crust begin to take up all that heat, and so if we can quantify the heat carried by those fluids, we can retrace it to its origins in magmas.

How do scientists measure these different forms of heat loss?

Scientists measure the heat carried by erupting magmas using satellites, or by adding up the erupted masses and making an estimate of how much energy was released by cooling from eruption temperatures to solid igneous rocks at Earth’s surface. Conductive heat flow is measured by drilling holes in the Earth’s crust to see how quickly it gets hotter with depth.

Measuring the heat carried by aqueous fluids in the crust is in some ways the trickiest. One approach is to find all the springs where hot or even slightly warm water is trickling out and measure the temperature and discharge to estimate how much extra heat that water is carrying.

What are the challenges and uncertainties in measuring hydrothermal heat discharge?

One challenge is that many springs are only slightly warmer than you’d expect. There is good data for many hot springs, but there are data tracking these ‘slightly warm’ springs for only a subset of arcs. Another challenge is that warm underground fluids can flow laterally, so you have to try to account for that. This is not an uncertainty in hydrothermal discharge, but one additional big uncertainty for our study, where we were trying to quantify the proportion of magmas that freeze underground versus erupting, is in the estimates of how much magma has actually erupted through time.

What are some of the factors that influence hydrothermal heat loss?

A main factor that influences hydrothermal heat loss is the magmas that solidify underground. This link is the key motivation for our study. A major goal of our paper is to try to quantify these hidden magmas—how much magma needs to intrude the crust beneath the surface to supply the hydrothermal heat fluxes that we observe? The composition of magmas influences how much heat they can release. The depth at which magmas are emplaced also matters, because magmas that intrude the shallow crust eventually cool to lower temperatures than magmas emplaced in the lower crust and therefore release more heat.

What are the remaining questions or knowledge gaps where additional research efforts are needed?

A big outstanding challenge is combining estimates from hydrothermal data of how much magma is coming into the crust – like ours – with other approaches to estimating the same thing. The magmatic systems beneath volcanoes span the crust. At the base of the crust, you have magma supply, sort of like the water main feeding your plumbing system. Despite how fundamental magma supply is, we know remarkably little about it. It’s exciting to think about how the rates of magma supply could vary through time and space and why. Applying a range of techniques—including geophysical imaging, hydrothermal budgets, gas and igneous geochemistry, and petrology—to understand these questions could really be a game changer.

—Benjamin A. Black (bblack@eps.rutgers.edu; 0000-0003-4585-6438), Rutgers University, United States; S. E. Ingebritsen (steve.ingebritsen@gmail.com; 0000-0001-6917-9369), Kyoto University, Japan; and Kazuki Sawayama (sawayama@bep.vgs.kyoto-u.ac.jp; 0000-0001-7988-3739), Kyoto University, Japan

Editor’s Note: It is the policy of AGU Publications to invite the authors of articles published in Reviews of Geophysics to write a summary for Eos Editors’ Vox.

Citation: Black, B. A., S. E. Ingebritsen, and K. Sawayama (2026), Hydrothermal heat flow as a window into subsurface arc magmas, Eos, 107, https://doi.org/10.1029/2026EO265017. Published on 28 April 2026.

This article does not represent the opinion of AGU, Eos, or any of its affiliates. It is solely the opinion of the author(s).

Text © 2026. The authors. CC BY-NC-ND 3.0
Except where otherwise noted, images are subject to copyright. Any reuse without express permission from the copyright owner is prohibited.

It’s long been clear that Italy’s Larderello region is supplied with abundant heat from Earth’s interior. The area, located in the center of Tuscany, is home to the world’s very first geothermal power plant and once bore the nickname “Devil’s Valley” for the steam vents that dot the rolling landscape.

The source of all of that heat has never been clear because the region has little volcanic activity. But now, new research points to the existence of a massive reservoir of magma, thousands of cubic kilometers in volume, hiding beneath Larderello.

The reservoir was discovered by University of Geneva geophysicist Matteo Lupi and his colleagues using a relatively new technique called ambient noise tomography (ANT). With ANT, the researchers peered deeper beneath the crust in the region, discovering anomalies that pointed to large volumes of magma.

The reservoir sits about 10 kilometers beneath the surface and is around 20 kilometers in diameter, the authors reported in a paper published in Communications Earth and Environment. Those dimensions make the reservoir comparable in size to those underlying so-called supervolcanoes like Yellowstone and Toba, though Lupi said there’s no apparent danger of an eruption anytime soon.

“I don’t think that, in human time frames, we should change the way we perceive the area,” he said. “Nevertheless, it’s beautiful to think that in a few hundred thousand years, we might find a supervolcano in there as well.”

Listening for Magma

Previous studies had posited the existence of large amounts of magma somewhere beneath Tuscany but never provided definitive evidence. A borehole project that concluded in 2018 revealed sudden temperature increases several kilometers down. Other studies using seismic vibrations to infer the structure of the crust in the region hinted at the presence of magma.

Lupi, along with colleagues in Italy, has been working to expand the use of ANT in Tuscany and elsewhere to make new and better images of structures deep underground. The technique involves using a network of seismometers to pick up on surface waves traveling through Earth that record a kind of background noise created by wind, ocean waves, and other subtle forces. Then, statistical algorithms help scientists find relevant seismic signals amid the static.

“Surface waves are sensitive to the shear properties of the rock,” said Brandon Schmandt, a geophysicist at Rice University who wasn’t affiliated with the research. “If you heat something or introduce a little melt, the shear properties weaken a lot. And so it’s a good way to find a big magma reservoir [in Earth’s crust].”

Using more than 60 seismometers spread across Tuscany and islands just offshore, Lupi and his team cross correlated surface wave data to produce a map of seismic velocities beneath Larderello. That map contains a large blob where seismic signals travel markedly slower than in other places. Those speeds align with a body of partially melted rock, Lupi said, surrounded by a region of slightly cooler and more solid “crystal mush.”

The researchers estimate the reservoir is about 5,000 cubic kilometers in volume, with molten rock making up about 80% of its innermost contents and about 20% of the surrounding crystal region.

A Missing Supervolcano?

The magma reservoir’s existence provides an explanation for the abundant geothermal activity in the Larderello region while simultaneously raising another question. The quantity of magma discovered could fuel a massive eruption on the scale of other supervolcanoes worldwide—yet no supervolcano exists in Tuscany.

Why Tuscany doesn’t host a caldera similar to Yellowstone in the United States is still an open question. There are several nonexclusive possibilities for the lack of eruptivity, said Federico Farina, a geologist and professor of geochemistry at the University of Milan who was also an author of the study. The magma under Larderello might be drier and therefore less eruptive, or it could have been produced, and therefore intruded into the crust, more slowly. Additionally, the structure of the crust in the region could have helped to trap the magma and prevent it from getting out.

Another clue to the region’s geological history comes from dating zircons, small crystals formed when magma cools and hardens. Farina has found zircons with different ages very close to each other in the rock matrix, which he said indicates a long-lived system where magma moves through different reservoirs as it cools. He said these zircons may also enable the researchers to model the size of the reservoir and better understand the speed and amount of magma accumulation there.

More to Come

Discovering so much magma underneath Tuscany is a surprise, but Lupi thinks it’s likely to be far from the only large magma reservoir hiding beneath a volcanically quiet region. He noted that research he carried out in the Andes around a decade ago also suggested, though not conclusively, the existence of a large, hidden magma reservoir. That experience was, in part, what convinced him to use ANT’s deep imaging capabilities elsewhere.

Schmandt agreed that large reservoirs are likely to exist in other places even when there’s little for human eyes to see. “This is good momentum in that direction to encourage people to look at it from a magmatic system standpoint and not just focus on the vents at the surface,” he said.

Lupi may not have to go far to discover his next massive pool of molten rock. He said his data indicated there may be another reservoir buried under nearby Mount Amiata that’s twice as big as the one beneath Larderello. That area was just at the edge of their seismometer network, meaning the team couldn’t fully resolve it.

—Nathaniel Scharping (@nathanielscharp), Science Writer

Citation: Scharping, N. (2026), Scientists find thousands of cubic kilometers of magma hiding beneath Tuscany, Eos, 107, https://doi.org/10.1029/2026EO260157. Published on 18 May 2026.

Text © 2026. The authors. CC BY-NC-ND 3.0
Except where otherwise noted, images are subject to copyright. Any reuse without express permission from the copyright owner is prohibited.

The volcano Ol Doinyo Lengai in Tanzania is unique on Earth: Its lava is rich in carbon compounds that melt at significantly lower temperatures than typical silicon-rich lavas from other terrestrial volcanoes.

It is possible, however, that carbon volcanoes could exist elsewhere, including on exoplanets, or—as suggested in a recently published article in Icarus—perhaps even on planet Mercury.

Despite being known from antiquity, Mercury is very hard to study because of its closeness to the Sun. As a result, the best data so far were gathered within the past 20 years by NASA’s MESSENGER (Mercury Surface, Space Environment, Geochemistry, and Ranging) probe. In particular, scientists identified mysterious pits they dubbed “hollows” scattered across Mercury’s surface. The hollows’ relatively bright appearance indicates they were formed in recent geological times, and could even be still forming today. The origins and geochemical makeup of these hollows are unknown.

“Mercury looks like the Moon a little bit, so we don’t expect large volcanoes,” said Maximilian Paul Reitze, a planetologist at Universität Münster’s Institut für Planetologie who is first author of the Icarus study. Without volcanic conditions like those on Earth or even on Jupiter’s moon Io, researchers expect Mercury to be largely geologically dormant. In other words, to explain hollows, “we need some volcanism under the conditions we expect on Mercury,” Reitze said.

Hence the interest in Ol Doinyo Lengai, known as the Mountain of God to the Maasai and Sonjo peoples. This volcano produces lava made up of carbonatites, igneous rocks composed of more than half carbon (and which are known to host critical minerals). These lavas flow at temperatures roughly 100°C lower than Mercury’s blazingly hot daytime temperature of 424°C. If the planet has a carbon-rich subsurface, as Reitze and his collaborators proposed, then the hollows could be Mercury’s version of Ol Doinyo Lengai.

This theory, however, has its skeptics.

“We know that there is carbon in [Mercury’s] crust, but the amount is very low,” said Paul Byrne, a planetary scientist at Washington University in St. Louis, who was not involved in the Icarus study. He also pointed out that the surface regions where carbon is most concentrated don’t correspond to higher concentrations of hollows. “For this to be some kind of carbon-based lava, it would imply a lot more carbon than we might think, given how widespread the hollows are.”

The Making of a Weird Planet

Mercury’s proximity to the Sun means that NASA’s Mariner 10 spacecraft provided humanity’s first-ever views when it flew by in 1974 and 1975. Three decades later, the MESSENGER mission was the first probe to orbit Mercury, mapping the planet’s full surface and turning up unexpected features like the hollows. The BepiColombo mission, a joint project of the European Space Agency and the Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency, is only the third mission ever to visit the planet, so when its two spacecraft settle into orbit in November 2026, it will almost inevitably reveal something unexpected, because it’s a weird planet.

Unlike Earth, Mars, or the Moon, Mercury has a freakishly large core and a thin mantle.

“Basically, Mercury is a molten ball bearing wrapped in a thin blanket of rock,” Byrne said. “One explanation is that early in the planet’s life, either one large or several smaller impacts stripped the outer portion away.”

The question then becomes what got vaporized, and what was left behind, particularly when trying to understand hollows. Many planetary researchers proposed that sulfides in the mantle could drive volcanism, but Reitze had doubts.

“The problem with sulfides I see is that they’re stable up to 1,000°C or so, which cannot explain the explosive volcanism that’s needed to form those hollows,” he said.

Instead, he and his coauthors contacted a colleague working on Ol Doinyo Lengai, who obtained a sample of the lava for laboratory study while it was still molten. Because carbonatite lava reacts chemically with Earth’s air very quickly, the researchers needed to isolate it to understand how the unaltered materials might behave under conditions on Mercury, particularly infrared spectra that could be confirmed by the BepiColombo mission.

In the hypothesis proposed by Reitze and colleagues, impacts from meteorites heat the carbon-rich magma below Mercury’s surface, melting it and driving eruptions. The hollows, which are found frequently on the slopes of Mercury’s craters or their central peaks, are the remains of those eruptions. Over time, further meteorite bombardments and intense solar radiation destroyed older hollows, which is why the ones in MESSENGER data were all formed within the past 270 million years—a short time ago, geologically speaking.

“The carbonatite angle is an interesting one, and I certainly wouldn’t rule it out,” Byrne said. “Anytime people have been confident about anything in planetary science, [planets have] shown you wrong. I’m certainly open to it, but is it the only explanation for all of the hollows? I am skeptical of that.”

Byrne and Reitze both dream of a future Mercury lander, a very challenging and expensive proposition nobody expects will happen soon. In the meantime, they agreed that BepiColombo data will help settle the question of whether the most Mercury-like place on Earth is a volcano in Tanzania.

—Matthew R. Francis (@BowlerHatScience.org), Science Writer

Citation: Francis, M. R. (2026), A unique African volcano could solve a mystery on Mercury, Eos, 107, https://doi.org/10.1029/2026EO260176. Published on 2 June 2026.

Text © 2026. The authors. CC BY-NC-ND 3.0
Except where otherwise noted, images are subject to copyright. Any reuse without express permission from the copyright owner is prohibited.

Magma on the move can cause the ground around a volcano to heave in measurable ways. But surface deformation doesn’t always point to an impending eruption—new results show that the terrain around a volcano can also shift during episodes of heavy rainfall. Researchers studying Japan’s Mount Fuji spotted instances of centimeter-level ground deformation tied to intense precipitation. Fortunately, such events can be readily differentiated from deformation caused by magmatic activity, the team reported in Geology.

Keeping an Eye on Volcanoes

Volcanoes around the world, from Kīlauea in the United States to Calbuco in Chile, are outfitted with arrays of sensors. Mount Fuji is no exception—the region around the edifice is equipped with dozens of instruments to detect ground movement, infrasound, and other signs of potential volcanic unrest. All that monitoring is warranted: Shin-Fuji (“Younger Fuji”)—the youngest of Mount Fuji’s three overlapping volcanoes—is currently active.

Shuo Zheng, a hydrological geodesist at Hong Kong Polytechnic University in China, and his colleagues recently mined some of those Mount Fuji data. The team focused on Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) observations—otherwise known as GPS data—collected daily from 2017 to 2023.

Rain and Rise

Zheng and his collaborators found several instances in which the two GNSS stations located within 10 kilometers of the summit of Mount Fuji recorded clear signs of uplift. Those signals, reflecting changes of roughly 1–2 centimeters, far exceeded the sensors’ millimeter-level precision. And when the team correlated the timing of that uplift with rain gauge records, they found that the ground often tended to rise almost immediately during periods of heavy precipitation (defined as several tens of millimeters of rain falling per day).

There’s likely a physical link behind that correlation, the researchers surmised. The explanation involves the so-called clinkers that cap each of Mount Fuji’s subterranean layers of lava. Clinkers are layers of small rocks that form when the surface of a lava flow rapidly cools, and these structures persist in the shallow subsurface of Mount Fuji. “They can store and transmit groundwater, acting like aquifers,” Zheng said.

When water fills up the pore space within a clinker, there’s no place for the overlying ground to go but up. It therefore makes sense that GNSS stations located atop old lava layers would exhibit uplift in response to intense rainfall, the team concluded.

When Zheng and his collaborators analyzed data from the nine GNSS stations located between 25 and 40 kilometers from the summit, however, they found that the ground actually tended to subside during periods of heavy precipitation. “There are two different responses,” said Kosuke Heki, a geophysicist and geodesist at Hokkaido University in Japan and a member of the research team. That subsidence is a known effect, and it’s been observed in a variety of locales. The subsidence doesn’t dominate closer to the summit of Mount Fuji because of the presence of the clinker layers there, the team reasoned.

Long-Lasting Magma

The uplift that the team recorded close to the summit of Mount Fuji tended to last just a day or two; it disappeared when the rainfall ceased. That timing is key for differentiating precipitation-induced uplift from magma-induced uplift. “Uplift by rain easily terminates when it stops raining,” said Heki. “But magma has a much longer timescale. It continues for weeks or months.”

That difference is critical, said Luca Caricchi, a volcanologist at the Université de Genève who was not involved in the research. There’s long been the mindset that ground deformation means that an eruption is imminent, but these new findings show that a heaving volcano doesn’t always mean that magma is on the move, said Caricchi. If the deformation is short-lived, the explanation might just be precipitation, he said. “You don’t need to worry.”

Zheng and his colleagues have looked for a similar effect for other volcanoes in Japan. They didn’t find any conclusive trends when they analyzed a chain of island volcanoes south of Tokyo, however. Perhaps that’s because the clinker layers beneath those edifices are so close to the sea that water efficiently drains out of them, the team hypothesized.

—Katherine Kornei (@KatherineKornei), Science Writer

Citation: Kornei, K. (2026), Heavy rainfall inflates Mount Fuji, Eos, 107, https://doi.org/10.1029/2026EO260169. Published on 26 May 2026.

Text © 2026. The authors. CC BY-NC-ND 3.0
Except where otherwise noted, images are subject to copyright. Any reuse without express permission from the copyright owner is prohibited.

Central Mongolia’s Hangay Mountains have long posed a conundrum. Rising 4 kilometers above sea level, the dome-shaped range plays a key role in shaping the region’s climate. But it couldn’t have formed in the same way as most equally tall mountain ranges.

“These mountains in central Mongolia are very far from any plate boundary, about 3,000 kilometers away from the Pacific margin,” said Pengfei Li, a geologist at the Chinese Academy of Sciences’ Guangzhou Institute of Geochemistry. “It’s very hard to understand why we have such a mountain range so far from the plate boundary.”

Li recently led research finding that geochemical evidence supports a compelling explanation of how these oddball mountains formed. The researchers proposed that at the site of the future mountains, a U-shaped bend in a tectonic plate led to an extra-thick lithosphere. A chunk of that heavy lithosphere eventually broke off and sunk into the mantle. Free of the extra weight, the crust then rebounded upward as the Hangay Mountains.

Bend and Snap

Tectonic plates are far from rigid. As they move above, below, and against each other, sections of the plates far from the boundary can develop curves and folds like a scrunched up tablecloth. Curved sections, called oroclines, are common around the world. At about 6,000 kilometers long, the Mongolian orocline is one of the longest, and the Hangay Mountains sit right at the curviest part of the orocline’s U shape.

Li and his colleagues suspected that the Hangays’ location along the orocline is no coincidence. During multiple field expeditions from 2018 through 2026, the researchers collected rock samples from several sites in the Hangay Mountains that showed signs of ancient volcanic activity. Uranium-lead dating of zircons within those samples showed that the area experienced volcanic activity in the early Cretaceous period 124–114 million years ago.

“When I saw the age, I was surprised,” Li said. “120 million years—no one had ever reported volcanoes [in the Hangay Mountains] during this period.…It’s the first discovery of volcanism for this period.”

The team also analyzed the samples for major and trace elements to determine the depth at which the rocks formed. Their geochemical analysis revealed that the rocks formed in the lithosphere 80 kilometers below the surface. They published these results in Geology in April.

It’s pretty odd that the rocks originated so deep, Li said, because the modern-day lithosphere is only 70 kilometers thick.

The team proposed that when the continental plate folded and created the Mongolian orocline 200 million years ago, the lithosphere bunched up and became thicker in the curve of the U shape. That thicker section of lithosphere, a root at least 80 kilometers thick, would have been unstable in the long term, Li explained.

The lithospheric root would have been too heavy to remain attached to the crust above for long, and a chunk of it would have eventually snapped off. When it sunk, or foundered, into the deep mantle, it would have melted and generated the volcanic activity recorded in the rocks the team studied. Free from the weight of that lithospheric root, the crust above would have rebounded into the dome-shaped mountain range visible today.

Complicated Yet Compelling

“The story that [the researchers] have put together to explain the massive Hangay topographic ‘dome’ of central west Mongolia is a compelling one that spans more than the past 200 million years of Earth history,” said Stephen Johnston, a tectonics researcher at the University of Alberta in Canada who was not involved with this research. Past research into the Iberian orocline suggested that oroclines might lead to lithospheric thickening, and this explanation of the Hangay Mountains fits that narrative.

“Their story, though complicated, makes a great deal of sense and in a way provides affirmation of a prediction made some time ago regarding oroclines,” Johnston added.

Johnston said that the new explanation of how the Hangay Mountains formed makes him wonder why it took so long—80 million years—between when the orocline formed and when the lithospheric root sank.

“This seems a long time for a gravitationally unstable mantle root to have remained attached to the overlying crust,” he said. He hopes that future work can help determine whether this process has taken place at other oroclines around the world and has simply been overlooked or whether there is something special about the Mongolian orocline.

Li and his team have turned their attention to how the formation of the Hangay Mountains shaped the region’s ancient climate. Today, the towering mountain range prevents moist air from northern Mongolia from reaching the parched Gobi Desert in the south. They hope to connect how a process deep underground, like lithospheric foundering, affected the paleoclimate and, consequently, the region’s habitability.

“It’s very new to try to understand the Earth’s habitability from a deeper sense,” Li said.

—Kimberly M. S. Cartier (@astrokimcartier.bsky.social), Staff Writer

Correction 18 May 2026: The distance between the Hangay Mountains and the Pacific plate margin has been corrected. The location of newly discovered volcanic activity has been corrected.

This news article is included in our ENGAGE resource for educators seeking science news for their classroom lessons. Browse all ENGAGE articles, and share with your fellow educators how you integrated the article into an activity in the comments section below.

Citation: Cartier, K. M. S. (2026), Mongolian mountains rose when the crust bounced back, Eos, 107, https://doi.org/10.1029/2026EO260153. Published on 15 May 2026.

Text © 2026. AGU. CC BY-NC-ND 3.0
Except where otherwise noted, images are subject to copyright. Any reuse without express permission from the copyright owner is prohibited.