The housekeeper claimed she was denied bathroom access and meal breaks, as…

© <p>Jamie McCarthy/WireImage</p>

© <p>Jamie McCarthy/WireImage</p>

I’ve been saying the same thing over and over again lately: I just want to feel caught up in my life. Not ahead, not on top of everything… just caught up, like there isn’t something waiting the second I finish whatever’s in front of me.
I said this to my boyfriend recently, and he immediately pushed back. There’s always going to be something else, he said—another email, another plan to make, another decision waiting for you at 5 pm. (To be clear, this was not the answer I was hoping for.) The feeling of being caught up isn’t something you arrive at and it stays that way forever. It’s something you keep creating, in small ways, throughout the day—often without realizing it.
That’s what I’ve been paying attention to this spring. A handful of small habits that have changed how I move through my life. I’m showing up differently to my work, my relationships, and even the way I think about things like food and fitness. Everything feels a little more additive and less like something I have to push through.

We’re in that in-between window right now—the stretch between May and the start of summer—when routines haven’t fully settled and there’s still room to change how things feel. I’m thinking of it as a kind of runway: a few weeks where these shifts have time to build. That way, by the time summer arrives, you’re not starting from scratch. You’re already in it.
The idea of a reset sounds appealing, but it implies starting over, doing things perfectly, and getting everything in place all at once. Right when your energy is already stretched.
What’s felt more useful to me this season is a simpler approach. Paying attention to what already makes me feel better, and doing a little more of that.
These are the habits I’ve been returning to. They’re simple, but they’ve changed more than I expected.
I didn’t set out to change the way I eat this spring. It just… happened? Somewhere between farmer’s market runs and throwing together quick lunches, I started noticing that the meals I actually looked forward to all had one thing in common: they were full of color. Bright greens, spring strawberries, fresh herbs. All the goodness of the season made it’s way to my plate.
That shift alone has made food feel easier. When you start with color, the rest tends to fall into place. You build meals that are more satisfying, more energizing, and a lot less rigid.
Try this: Once a day, start with what looks fresh and vibrant, then add something creamy and something crunchy to round it out.
Some colorful meals to get you inspired:
I’ve stopped waiting for something new to make my days feel better. Most of the shift has come from paying a little more attention to what’s already there and treating it like it matters.
The same coffee, but in a beautiful mug (taken outside instead of standing at the counter). Romantizing my lunch break. An evening walk that isn’t just about steps, but about noticing the light, the air, and the fact that I’m there.
This habit is all about you move through what’s already part of your life. That small shift has made everything feel a little more intentional and a lot more enjoyable.
Try this: Pick one everyday habit and make it feel like something you chose: better ingredients, a different setting, or one small detail that makes you want to be in it.
For a long time, I thought a good workout had to leave me completely spent. 30 minutes minimum, high intensity, no shortcuts—otherwise it didn’t count. That mindset kept me stuck in a cycle where I’d go all in for a few days, burn out, and then fall off entirely.
What shifted for me was realizing that consistency has a lot less to do with intensity than I thought. Research around “exercise snacks”—short, more frequent bursts of movement throughout the day—shows that even small amounts of activity can have a meaningful impact on your energy and overall well-being.
Pulling back just slightly in my workouts and letting shorter sessions count has made it easier to create a routine. I feel better afterward, not depleted, and that alone has changed how consistently I show up.
Try this: Let your next workout be less intense than you think it should be—or break it into smaller moments throughout the day. Then notice how you feel later, not just when it ends.
I didn’t realize how much my evenings were being shaped by my workday until I started paying attention to how I ended it. Without a clear break, everything just blurred together (flashback to how I spent every weekday during the pandemic, yikes). I’d technically be done, but still carrying the loose ends into the rest of my night.
Instead, I’ve been building in a small transition. A moment that signals to my body that I’m shifting out of one mode and into another. This isn’t a productivity hack. It’s all about giving yourself a chance to actually start your evening feeling restored.
Try this: Choose one consistent action that marks the end of your workday—stepping outside, putting on a different playlist, making a fun beverage—and let that be the signal that you’re done.
It’s taken me forever to accept this: there will always be something left on the list. That part doesn’t change, no matter how early you start or how efficient you are. What I’ve started experimenting with is deciding where the line is—choosing when the day is complete, instead of waiting for everything to be finished.
Trust me, it cchanges the feeling of your mornings, evenings, and really your life. Instead of carrying that low-level sense of “I should still be doing something,” you give yourself permission to stop. Over time, that starts to feel less like a compromise and more like a choice.
Try this: At the end of the day, choose one thing that can be saved for tomorrow or next week. This isn’t procrastination—it’s prioritization.
By the time late afternoon rolls around, even small decisions can feel heavier than they should. What to make for dinner, whether to work out, how to spend the evening—it all starts to blur together in a way that makes everything feel more draining than it actually is.
I’ve started noticing how much easier my days feel when I make one or two of those decisions earlier, before my energy dips. No full plan, just removing that one moment where everything suddenly feels like too much.
Try this: Decide one thing ahead of time—dinner, your workout, or your evening plan—so you’re not figuring it out when you’re already tired.
Not everything in your day needs to be efficient to be worthwhile. (Read that back.) I’ve been leaving space for one small, unplanned detour—a side quest, in the loosest sense of the word. Something I didn’t need to do, but wanted to.
We’re not going for drama here. A different route on a walk, stopping for something that caught my eye, lingering a little longer somewhere instead of rushing through. You’ll be shocked: it completely changes how your day feels.
Try this: Leave room for one small, unnecessary decision today—something guided by curiosity instead of efficiency. Follow it without overthinking.
Evenings can feel the most chaotic because they’re often the most undefined part of your day. By the time you get there, your energy is low, your patience is thinner, and everything—from dinner to what to do afterward—feels like one more thing to figure out.
What’s helped is giving the evening a loose shape ahead of time. Not a rigid plan, just a general direction so you’re not starting from zero when you’re already tired.
Try this: Earlier in the day, decide what kind of night you’re having—something simple like “easy dinner and a walk” or “catch up and early to bed.”
This has been one of the simplest shifts with the biggest impact. Instead of treating time outside as something extra, I’ve started building parts of my day around it—moving small, everyday moments into the light whenever I can.
A few minutes in the sun in the morning, a walk before dinner, even taking a call outside… It all adds up! You feel more awake, more present, and more connected to your routine in a way that’s hard to replicate indoors. (You’ll sleep better, too.)
Try this: Take one thing you already do—coffee, a call, a break—and move it into natural light. Let that be the anchor your day builds around.
This has been a complete game-changer in removing the “should’s” from my day. I’ve started paying closer attention to what actually makes me feel better. More clear, more energized, and more like myself. Some of it is obvious, some of it is surprising. But once you notice it, it becomes easier to come back to. You stop guessing what you need, and start recognizing it in real time.
Try this: At the end of the day, take a minute to notice what gave you energy. Look for one way to repeat it tomorrow.
The funny thing is, I still don’t feel “caught up” in my life. At least, not in the way I thought I would. There are still emails (there will ALWAYS be emails), still decisions, and still things waiting for me at the end of the day. But I do feel a little more present, a little more energized, and a little more like I’m actually in my life instead of trying to keep up with it.
That’s what these habits have given me. Not a full reset, not a perfect routine—just a series of small shifts that build on each other over time. And that’s the real opportunity this season. You don’t need to change everything before summer gets here. You just need to start paying attention to what makes you feel better and let that lead the way.
The post If You Want to Feel Better by Summer, Start With These 10 Things appeared first on Camille Styles.


© Photo illustration: Brad Japhe
Farage was given £5m by the Thai-based billionaire Christopher Harborne shortly before announcing he would stand in the 2024 general election
Here is the running order for PMQs.
Nigel Farage was given £5m by the crypto billionaire Christopher Harborne shortly before announcing he would stand in the 2024 British general election, Anna Isaac reports.
Continue reading...
© Photograph: Joe Giddens/PA

© Photograph: Joe Giddens/PA

© Photograph: Joe Giddens/PA

You already sense it. The game has tilted toward collaboration as the new face of competition. A small business competing in isolation is like an individual bringing a knife to a gunfight, especially when big corporations have tanks and missiles.
In market after market, firms that once fought for inches now build lanes together, then race in them. The giants signpost the shift. Apple and Samsung are dueling for smartphone sales, while Samsung’s component arm supplies the OLED displays that make iPhones glow. This summer, they even expanded their partnership, and Samsung now supplies chips from a Texas factory for Apple’s iPhones. Apple and Google wrestle for mobile mindshare, yet Google pays Apple billions each year to be the default search engine on iPhone. The rivals compete in devices and services, while cooperating where both gain reach and revenue.
Automakers offer another lesson. Ford and General Motors jointly developed transmissions to spread costs and accelerate time-to-market, while still going head-to-head in showrooms. BMW and Toyota have partnered on hydrogen systems and even a shared sports car platform, each preserving its identity while pooling the heavy lift.
Even in the entertainment industry (where rivalries are legendary), competitors team up when the infrastructure is heavy and the outside threat is larger than the fight between them. Microsoft and Sony agreed to explore cloud and streaming services together while still slugging it out for players and titles.
This idea has a name with roots in strategy research: coopetition. Coopetition is a blend of "cooperation" and "competition," where competing entities work together toward a common goal while still maintaining competitive interests in other areas. This concept allows businesses to collaborate in certain aspects, such as research and development, while competing in the marketplace for customers and market share.
If major corporations can alternate between contest and collaboration, what does that mean for the underdog that lives on cash flow and speed? It means advantages. Small firms can trade fixed costs for access and turn local trust into a regional footprint. Crucially, you can do it without dulling your edge. You can protect your absolute advantage and still grow through smart alliances. Think of it like neighbors who decide to share the cost of digging a well. They may still cook their food separately, but sharing water helps both survive.
Big companies embrace this logic because it works. The question is no longer whether cooperation has a place in competitive strategy; the question is how small businesses can use the same playbook to grow faster and reach farther without giving away the crown jewels.
Why should small businesses embrace coopetition? There are plenty of reasons, the biggest being:
The loneliness tax is the hidden cost you pay when you run your business alone. For example, a small restaurant owner can spend all their savings on marketing but still struggles to fill seats. Right down the street, another restaurant is also struggling. If both teamed up to run a joint food festival, they could attract bigger crowds, share costs, and both make more money. In other words, when you refuse to collaborate, you carry all burdens alone, and your growth is slower.
The friction tax is the cost of fighting your competitors unnecessarily. For example, two small grocery stores in the same neighborhood lower prices every week to outdo each other. Customers enjoy the price war, but the stores are bleeding profit. If they agreed to share delivery or other costs, they might save money. Their constant “fight” created friction that drained them.
Think like an owner of a portfolio of bets, not a single bet. In practice, that means you decide, at the level of a function, where you will collaborate and where you will compete. For example, you can share the back office and fight for the front office.
When small businesses come together, the excitement of new opportunities can make them overlook the fine print. But you shouldn’t dive into a collaboration without rules that keep everyone safe and focused. Think of these rules as the guardrails on a highway (they don’t stop you from moving forward, they keep you from crashing).
As a small business owner, ask yourself these 2 questions:
Every place you answer yes is a candidate for coopetition. If you embrace coopetition with clear eyes and clean boundaries, you will find that collaboration is not the end of competition. It is the way you make competition worth winning.

Over the past decade, compensation for artificial intelligence (AI) professionals has surged at an unprecedented pace, reshaping the talent market and redefining what employers must offer to attract and retain top-tier technical talent. As companies across nearly every sector race to integrate machine learning, automation, and generative AI into their operations, the demand for skilled AI engineers, researchers, and product leaders has vastly outstripped supply. The result is a compensation environment that is not only highly competitive, but increasingly aggressive.
What makes this shift especially striking is how rapidly it has accelerated. Even five years ago, AI roles commanded above-average compensation, but nowhere near the levels seen today. Now, seven-figure packages for senior AI experts are not only possible, they’re becoming increasingly common.
This surge is driven by a unique convergence of market forces: the explosion of generative AI capabilities, a shortage of qualified talent, escalating corporate reliance on AI strategy, and the emergence of new startup and investment ecosystems flush with capital. Together, these factors are pushing AI compensation to historic highs, with no signs of slowing down.
And of course, this article was written with the research assistance of AI.
AI is one of the few fields in which global demand massively exceeds global supply of qualified professionals. Only a small subset of software engineers possess the deep expertise required for advanced machine learning, reinforcement learning, natural language processing, and large-scale model development. Even fewer have hands-on experience with cutting-edge deep learning architectures or the ability to integrate foundation models into commercial products.
Companies are discovering that they are effectively competing for the same limited pool of elite talent. And that competition is fierce.
Here are a few key reasons AI talent is scarce:
This scarcity alone would elevate compensation, but the explosive commercial potential of AI has supercharged it.
The release of large-scale generative AI models has catalyzed a gold rush. Companies of all sizes now recognize that AI will determine competitive advantage in the coming decade. As firms shift from “AI experiments” to “AI strategy,” the urgency to hire expert talent has become acute.
Generative AI has created entirely new job categories, including:
In many cases, these roles did not exist 18 months ago. Now, they are some of the highest-paying jobs in the technology sector.
Compensation varies widely based on geography, seniority, company size, and specialization. But one trend is clear: AI salaries are increasing across the board, often dramatically.
Typical U.S. salary ranges for AI roles:
And these figures do not account for extreme outliers—most notably the seven-figure offers made by OpenAI, Anthropic, Google DeepMind, Meta, and specialized hedge funds or trading firms.
Compensation for AI talent is highest in the Silicon Valley/San Francisco area, followed by New York and then Seattle.
AI startup funding is booming. Investors are pouring billions into companies developing foundation models, AI infrastructure, and vertical AI applications. With capital plentiful and competition intense, startups are offering generous equity to lure experienced AI hires away from Big Tech.
What startups are offering:
For highly specialized engineers, particularly those with LLM or multimodal model experience, equity stakes can be extremely significant.
The big players are stepping up as well. In late 2025, OpenAI’s average stock compensation reportedly reached $1.5 million per employee for its 4000 person workforce.
AI is no longer limited to technology firms. Industries such as healthcare, finance, manufacturing, retail, defense, and media all have aggressive AI build-out strategies. This has expanded the competition for talent beyond Silicon Valley, creating upward pressure on compensation.
For example:
These companies often have substantial cash reserves, enabling them to offer compelling salary packages more commonly associated with Big Tech.
Remote-first hiring has created a global bidding environment. Companies that once paid lower regional salaries are now forced to match global standards—especially when competing against deep-pocketed AI enterprises and venture-backed startups.
As a result:
This globalization has further driven compensation upward.
As poaching becomes rampant, companies are creating elaborate retention structures, including:
Companies recognize that replacing a senior AI engineer or researcher is extremely costly, and often impossible in the short term.
Companies should expect:
Organizations that fail to invest in AI talent will struggle to compete strategically, technologically, and operationally.
For employees, the moment is historic. AI expertise, especially in LLMs, applied machine learning, infrastructure, safety, and AI product design, is one of the most valuable skill sets in the global economy.
Professionals should:
Those with the right skills can expect strong compensation growth for the foreseeable future.
This section outlines the most important strategies, components, and negotiation techniques AI employees can use to maximize compensation and secure long-term professional protection.
A common mistake candidates make is focusing on base salary alone. In AI roles—especially at high-growth startups—base salary may not be the most important part of the package.
AI employees should evaluate:
Total compensation packages in AI can vary by hundreds of thousands of dollars depending on equity and incentives, making it essential to evaluate the full structure.
AI startups and AI-first public companies rely heavily on equity to attract top-tier talent. But equity terms are nuanced and highly negotiable.
Key equity terms you should negotiate:
A single percentage point of equity at a strong AI startup can be worth millions of dollars in a successful exit. Do not underestimate your ability to negotiate this component.
Pro tip: Ask for your equity in terms of percentage ownership, not number of shares. This forces companies to reveal the fully diluted share count.
AI work is often tied to quantifiable outcomes: model accuracy, latency improvements, deployment milestones, or product releases. This makes it easier to negotiate objective bonus structures, rather than subjective or discretionary ones.
You can negotiate:
Beyond salary and bonuses, benefits protect well-being and support work-life integration—particularly important for senior leaders.
Benefits can include:
Given the velocity of change in AI—funding cycles, pivots, acquisitions, and leadership turnover, severance protections are essential. They are highly negotiable for AI professionals.
Negotiate for:
Many AI companies do not offer severance by default, but will add it if asked by a senior or highly valuable hire.
AI employees who interview with multiple companies often have dramatically better outcomes. Even one additional offer can significantly increase your negotiation leverage.
Tips for handling competing offers:
Companies expect AI talent to be in high demand. You should expect and encourage competition.
AI work often includes high-stakes systems, regulatory exposure, or sensitive data. Professionals should negotiate strong protections.
You can ask for:
AI professionals involved in model development, compliance, or safety can insist on explicit liability protection.
AI talent is global, and many companies are remote-first. If location flexibility matters to you, negotiate it early.
You can request:
Given how scarce AI talent is, many companies will accommodate flexibility for the right candidate.
Here are some additional important issues to consider when negotiating an employment contract or offer letter:
AI compensation packages, especially those involving equity, are increasingly complex. Understanding tax implications, vesting schedules, and contract terms often requires professional review.
An attorney or advisor can help you:
A modest legal investment can protect hundreds of thousands—and sometimes millions—of dollars in future compensation. And sometimes you can negotiate for the company to reimburse your reasonable legal fees incurred.
AI employees today are in a uniquely powerful negotiating position. Compensation is skyrocketing. Companies are racing to hire scarce talent, and the strategic importance of AI expertise has never been higher. By approaching negotiations with clarity, confidence, and a deep understanding of total compensation, AI professionals can secure packages that reflect both their current value and their long-term contribution.
In an era defined by rapid innovation and intense competition, negotiating well is not just a financial decision, it’s a strategic career move.
Related Articles:



© Photo illustration: Brad Japhe