YouTube viewers reportedly watch over two billion hours of YouTube Shorts — the platform’s vertical clips that are up to three minutes long — on televisions each month.
TikTok executives decided not to disable notifications during school hours, ignoring recommendations from their own safety team, and paid millions of dollars to parents’ and teachers’ associations to promote the social network in schools. Snapchat sent alerts to teenagers while they were in class urging them to share what was happening in the classroom. Google executives knew that YouTube was recommending videos to students during the school day that were unrelated to their lessons. Meta paid “teen ambassadors” to promote Instagram and hand out gifts to their classmates.
© JUAN BARBOSA
Fans are mourning the loss of John Davis.
The YouTuber, who made videos alongside his mother Frances "Tootsie" Davis in a series titled “Coffee Time With John and Momma,” died on June 10 following...
Measures to include restrictions on ‘safe’ social media apps, with some fearing banning some platforms and not others will lead to legal challenges
Teenagers under the age of 16 are to be banned from accessing “high-risk” social media apps while safer platforms will be subjected to restrictions, under a sweeping government crackdown.
Under-18s will also be banned from using romantic or sexual AI chatbots after a consultation on keeping children safe online.
Continue reading...
© Photograph: David Parry/PA
© Photograph: David Parry/PA
© Photograph: David Parry/PA
YouTube is expanding its AI likeness detection tool to everyone over 18 in the coming weeks -- meaning it will no longer be limited to select creators and public figures.
YouTube, TikTok, and Instagram are facing a flood of AI-generated content aimed at children. It’s easy and quick to create, and production is rampant. But it has the inherent flaws of AI-generated video: visual inconsistencies, narrative gaps, and a lack of realism. While it’s still too early for comprehensive studies, experts have already raised concerns about the impact of these videos on children’s cognitive development.
KUALA LUMPUR, June 8— The High Court here today fixed August 5 to rule on the prosecution’s appeal against the Sessions Court’s acquittal of human rights blogger Jufazli Shi Ahmad.
The appeal stems from two charges of making offensive posts against former prime minister Datuk Seri Ismail Sabri Yaakob and Umno via YouTube, and failing to provide a YouTube account password to police officers.
Judge Datuk Aslam Zainuddin set the date after hearing submissions from deputy public prosecutor Mohamad Shahrizzat Amadan and defence counsel Ramesh N.P. Chandran, representing Jufazli, 37.
On October 18, 2024, the Sessions Court acquitted and discharged Jufazli on both charges without calling for his defence.
In his submissions today, Mohamad Shahrizzat contended that the Sessions Court judge had erred in ruling that no evidence linked the respondent to the uploaded video, and that this error justifies an intervention by the High Court.
Meanwhile, Ramesh said the prosecution failed to adduce any evidence whatsoever from YouTube to prove that the respondent was the administrator or owner of the account known as “KingMaker”.
On July 7, 2022, Jufazli pleaded not guilty to uploading a video titled “Panas!! Supermodel Kantoi Merompak RM77.3 billion” on YouTube King Maker Politik at 3pm on June 27, 2022.
The offensive videos were viewed at 3pm at the Criminal Investigation Department of the Dang Wang district police headquarters on July 1, 2022.
The charge, framed under Section 233 (1) (a) of the Communications and Multimedia Act (CMA) 1998, carries a maximum fine of RM50,000 or imprisonment for up to one year or both, and is also liable to a further fine of RM1,000 for each day the offence persists after conviction.
Jufazli also claimed trial to a charge of failing to provide the password to his YouTube King Maker Politik account, stored on his mobile phone, to police officers at the Dang Wangi police headquarters at 12.10pm, July 5, 2022.
The charge was brought under Section 249 of the CMA, which is punishable by a maximum fine of RM100,000 or imprisonment of up to two years or both, upon conviction. — Bernama
"Charlie Bit My Finger" -- a private family video which unexpectedly became one of the earliest global viral videos on YouTube -- has been officially preserved by the British Film Institute (BFI).
Login