Over the past decade, compensation for artificial intelligence (AI) professionals has surged at an unprecedented pace, reshaping the talent market and redefining what employers must offer to attract and retain top-tier technical talent. As companies across nearly every sector race to integrate machine learning, automation, and generative AI into their operations, the demand for skilled AI engineers, researchers, and product leaders has vastly outstripped supply. The result is a compensation environment that is not only highly competitive, but increasingly aggressive.

What makes this shift especially striking is how rapidly it has accelerated. Even five years ago, AI roles commanded above-average compensation, but nowhere near the levels seen today. Now, seven-figure packages for senior AI experts are not only possible, they’re becoming increasingly common.

This surge is driven by a unique convergence of market forces: the explosion of generative AI capabilities, a shortage of qualified talent, escalating corporate reliance on AI strategy, and the emergence of new startup and investment ecosystems flush with capital. Together, these factors are pushing AI compensation to historic highs, with no signs of slowing down.

And of course, this article was written with the research assistance of AI.

The Talent Shortage Driving the Compensation Surge

AI is one of the few fields in which global demand massively exceeds global supply of qualified professionals. Only a small subset of software engineers possess the deep expertise required for advanced machine learning, reinforcement learning, natural language processing, and large-scale model development. Even fewer have hands-on experience with cutting-edge deep learning architectures or the ability to integrate foundation models into commercial products.

Companies are discovering that they are effectively competing for the same limited pool of elite talent. And that competition is fierce.

Here are a few key reasons AI talent is scarce:

• AI research and engineering require advanced mathematical, algorithmic, and computational training.
• Top-tier AI expertise is concentrated in a handful of universities and research labs.
• Rapid technological change means experience becomes outdated quickly, raising the premium on continuous learners.
• Many AI professionals gravitate toward startups or independent research labs rather than traditional corporate roles.
• Immigration constraints limit access to global AI expertise in certain regions, especially the U.S.

This scarcity alone would elevate compensation, but the explosive commercial potential of AI has supercharged it.

Generative AI Has Reshaped the Compensation Landscape

The release of large-scale generative AI models has catalyzed a gold rush. Companies of all sizes now recognize that AI will determine competitive advantage in the coming decade. As firms shift from “AI experiments” to “AI strategy,” the urgency to hire expert talent has become acute.

Generative AI has created entirely new job categories, including:

• Large Language Model (LLM) Engineers
  
• Prompt Engineers and Prompt Architects
• AI Product Managers and AI Strategy Leads
• Applied AI Scientists
• Multimodal AI Specialists
• AI Safety and Alignment Researchers
• Model Evaluation and Red Teaming Experts
• AI Video Specialists

In many cases, these roles did not exist 18 months ago. Now, they are some of the highest-paying jobs in the technology sector.

Salaries Are Reaching Historic Highs

Compensation varies widely based on geography, seniority, company size, and specialization. But one trend is clear: AI salaries are increasing across the board, often dramatically.

Typical U.S. salary ranges for AI roles:

• Machine Learning Engineer: $180,000–$350,000+ total compensation
  
• Senior AI Scientist: $300,000–$600,000+
  
• LLM Engineer or Generative AI Engineer: $400,000–$900,000+
  
• AI Product Director: $350,000–$700,000+
  
• Head of AI / VP of AI: $700,000–$2,000,000+
  
• Distinguished AI Researcher at top tech firms: Often over $1 million, with equity packages that can reach multi-millions

And these figures do not account for extreme outliers—most notably the seven-figure offers made by OpenAI, Anthropic, Google DeepMind, Meta, and specialized hedge funds or trading firms.

Compensation for AI talent is highest in the Silicon Valley/San Francisco area, followed by New York and then Seattle.

Startups Are Offering Massive Equity Packages

AI startup funding is booming. Investors are pouring billions into companies developing foundation models, AI infrastructure, and vertical AI applications. With capital plentiful and competition intense, startups are offering generous equity to lure experienced AI hires away from Big Tech.

What startups are offering:

• Sign-on equity that may exceed 0.5–2% of the company for early senior hires
  
• Better vesting schedules (e.g., no cliff vesting, shorter vest cycles)
• Performance-based equity refreshers
• Access to secondary liquidity opportunities as they become available
• Hybrid cash/equity compensation at levels competitive with major tech companies

For highly specialized engineers, particularly those with LLM or multimodal model experience, equity stakes can be extremely significant.

The big players are stepping up as well. In late 2025, OpenAI’s average stock compensation reportedly reached $1.5 million per employee for its 4000 person workforce.

Non-Tech Companies Are Entering the Bidding War

AI is no longer limited to technology firms. Industries such as healthcare, finance, manufacturing, retail, defense, and media all have aggressive AI build-out strategies. This has expanded the competition for talent beyond Silicon Valley, creating upward pressure on compensation.

For example:

• Financial institutions are recruiting AI specialists for algorithmic trading and risk modeling.
  
• Healthcare companies need AI leaders for diagnostics, drug discovery, and patient management systems.
• Traditional industrial firms are hiring machine learning engineers to optimize robotics, forecasting, and supply chain operations.

These companies often have substantial cash reserves, enabling them to offer compelling salary packages more commonly associated with Big Tech.

Remote Work Has Globalized the AI Salary Market

Remote-first hiring has created a global bidding environment. Companies that once paid lower regional salaries are now forced to match global standards—especially when competing against deep-pocketed AI enterprises and venture-backed startups.

As a result:

• Compensation is rising across Europe, Latin America, India, and Southeast Asia.
  
• Remote AI contractors in lower-cost countries are sometimes commanding Silicon Valley–level pay.
• Employers can no longer rely on geographic arbitrage to meaningfully cut costs.

This globalization has further driven compensation upward.

Retention Packages Are Becoming More Aggressive

As poaching becomes rampant, companies are creating elaborate retention structures, including:

• Annual equity refresh grants
  
• Retention bonuses tied to multi-year milestones
• Stay bonuses during M&A or restructuring
• Accelerated equity vesting for high performers

Companies recognize that replacing a senior AI engineer or researcher is extremely costly, and often impossible in the short term.

What This Means for Employers

Companies should expect:

• Longer search timelines for AI roles
  
• Substantially higher compensation budgets
• The need for flexible, customized packages
• Aggressive competition from startups and Big Tech
• Ongoing retention challenges

Organizations that fail to invest in AI talent will struggle to compete strategically, technologically, and operationally.

What This Means for AI Professionals

For employees, the moment is historic. AI expertise, especially in LLMs, applied machine learning, infrastructure, safety, and AI product design, is one of the most valuable skill sets in the global economy.

Professionals should:

• Negotiate assertively
  
• Evaluate total comp (salary, bonus, equity, benefits)
• Secure severance and change-in-control protections
• Understand equity liquidity options
• Consider both Big Tech stability and startup upside

Those with the right skills can expect strong compensation growth for the foreseeable future.

How AI Employees Can Negotiate High-Value Compensation Packages

This section outlines the most important strategies, components, and negotiation techniques AI employees can use to maximize compensation and secure long-term professional protection.

1. Evaluate Total Compensation, Not Just Salary

A common mistake candidates make is focusing on base salary alone. In AI roles—especially at high-growth startups—base salary may not be the most important part of the package.

AI employees should evaluate:

• Base salary
• Annual bonuses or performance incentives
• Equity grants
• Retention or milestone bonuses
• Equity refresh cycles
• Severance protections
• Change-in-control payments

Total compensation packages in AI can vary by hundreds of thousands of dollars depending on equity and incentives, making it essential to evaluate the full structure.

2. Negotiate Equity—It’s Often the Most Valuable Component

AI startups and AI-first public companies rely heavily on equity to attract top-tier talent. But equity terms are nuanced and highly negotiable.

Key equity terms you should negotiate:

• Size of the grant (expressed as % ownership or # of shares)
• Equity type (options vs. RSUs)
• Vesting schedule (you can ask for shorter vesting schedules and no cliff vesting)
• Acceleration triggers (single- vs. double-trigger vesting)
• Windows to exercise options after leaving the company (traditionally 90 days but you can request one year)
• Ability to participate in secondary sales

A single percentage point of equity at a strong AI startup can be worth millions of dollars in a successful exit. Do not underestimate your ability to negotiate this component.

Pro tip: Ask for your equity in terms of percentage ownership, not number of shares. This forces companies to reveal the fully diluted share count.

3. Push for Clear and Achievable Bonus Structures

AI work is often tied to quantifiable outcomes: model accuracy, latency improvements, deployment milestones, or product releases. This makes it easier to negotiate objective bonus structures, rather than subjective or discretionary ones.

You can negotiate:

• A signing bonus
• A target bonus (often 20–50% of salary for senior roles)
• A guaranteed minimum first-year bonus
• Objective, measurable performance metrics
• A clear timeline for bonus evaluation
• Eligibility for multi-year performance awards

4. Benefits and Perks

Beyond salary and bonuses, benefits protect well-being and support work-life integration—particularly important for senior leaders.

Benefits can include:

• Comprehensive health, dental, vision, life, and disability insurance
• Retirement plans such as 401(k) with employer match and pension enhancements.
• Vacation, sick leave, and paid time off accruals with carry-over provisions on termination.
• Relocation assistance, travel allowances, and technology stipends.
• Parental leave

5. Secure Strong Severance and Termination Protections

Given the velocity of change in AI—funding cycles, pivots, acquisitions, and leadership turnover, severance protections are essential. They are highly negotiable for AI professionals.

Negotiate for:

• 3–12 months of salary severance pay if fired without cause, together with 3-12 months of target bonus
• Continuation of benefits or COBRA during the severance period
• Accelerated vesting of equity upon termination without cause
• Severance triggers if your role changes materially
• Limit the “cause” definition– you want to avoid broad definitions of being terminated for “cause” to avoid losing out on severance
• Mutual releases of liability and mutual non-disparagement clauses in the event of termination without cause

Many AI companies do not offer severance by default, but will add it if asked by a senior or highly valuable hire.

6. Leverage Competing Offers Strategically

AI employees who interview with multiple companies often have dramatically better outcomes. Even one additional offer can significantly increase your negotiation leverage.

Tips for handling competing offers:

• Never bluff—only leverage real offers.
  
• Share general ranges, not exact numbers (“my other offer is in the ~$500K range”).
• Emphasize fit and culture, not financial extraction.
• Allow employers to “revise” offers rather than demanding increases.

Companies expect AI talent to be in high demand. You should expect and encourage competition.

7. Protect Yourself from Liability

AI work often includes high-stakes systems, regulatory exposure, or sensitive data. Professionals should negotiate strong protections.

You can ask for:

• Company-backed D&O insurance (for senior roles)
  
• Indemnification for work done within the scope of your role
• Reasonable limits on personal liability

AI professionals involved in model development, compliance, or safety can insist on explicit liability protection.

8. Remote Work and Flexible Arrangements Are Negotiable

AI talent is global, and many companies are remote-first. If location flexibility matters to you, negotiate it early.

You can request:

• Fully remote work
  
• Hybrid flexibility (e.g., two days in the office each week)
• Home office stipends
• Relocation packages, if required
• Adjustments for time-zone differences

Given how scarce AI talent is, many companies will accommodate flexibility for the right candidate.

9. Consider Other Important Issues

Here are some additional important issues to consider when negotiating an employment contract or offer letter:

• Avoid any non-compete clauses that would hinder you from finding a new AI job. In some states like California, those are for the most part unenforceable anyway
• If there is a dispute with your employer, you will likely want the matter to be resolved by confidential binding arbitration to avoid lengthy and costly litigation
• Make sure you are not taking any documents or confidential information from your old employer– this can lead to expensive and embarrassing litigation
• Get any oral promises made to you in writing as part of your employment agreement or offer letter
• Carefully review the terms of any rights of repurchase on equity, right of first refusal, and company buy-back terms, which could limit the value of your equity

10. Work with an Attorney or Advisor for Complex Packages

AI compensation packages, especially those involving equity, are increasingly complex. Understanding tax implications, vesting schedules, and contract terms often requires professional review.

An attorney or advisor can help you:

• Interpret equity and vesting terms
  
• Understand company cap tables
• Identify red flags in employment contracts
• Strengthen negotiation positions
• Include protective contract terms

A modest legal investment can protect hundreds of thousands—and sometimes millions—of dollars in future compensation. And sometimes you can negotiate for the company to reimburse your reasonable legal fees incurred.

Conclusion on Compensation for AI Employees

AI employees today are in a uniquely powerful negotiating position. Compensation is skyrocketing. Companies are racing to hire scarce talent, and the strategic importance of AI expertise has never been higher. By approaching negotiations with clarity, confidence, and a deep understanding of total compensation, AI professionals can secure packages that reflect both their current value and their long-term contribution.

In an era defined by rapid innovation and intense competition, negotiating well is not just a financial decision, it’s a strategic career move.

Related Articles:

• 16 Key Issues in Negotiating an Employment Severance Package
• 14 Key Issues in Negotiating Employment Agreements
• Key Issues with Confidentiality and Invention Assignment Agreements with Employees
• How Employee Stock Options Work in Startup Companies

Hiring has bounced back this year from a miserable 2025, showing unexpected strength in the face of economic uncertainty and painfully high energy prices caused by the Iran war.

The first observance of what came to be known as Memorial Day was on May 30, 1868, when a Civil War general called on Americans to commemorate the sacrifices of Union soldiers. It was initially called Decoration Day, for the practice of decorating graves with wreaths and flags. And there were so many graves — more than 300,000 men had died on the Union side, and nearly as many for the Confederacy. In total, more died on both sides of the Civil War than in every other US conflict through the Korean War, combined.  

It wasn’t long, though, before remembrance began to be overshadowed by celebration. Within a year, the New York Times opined the holiday would no longer be “sacred” if parades and speeches became more central than the act of memorializing the dead. Which is precisely what happened, especially after Congress in 1971 fixed Memorial Day as the last Monday in May, making it the perfect launchpad for summer, with an increasingly perfunctory nod to the holiday’s original purpose.

The gap between those for whom Memorial Day is a moment of remembrance versus three days of hot dogs and hamburgers will likely only grow in the future, as veterans of previous wars pass away and the divide between America’s all-volunteer military and its civilians deepens. Fewer than 1 percent of the US adult population serves in the military, and those still signing up increasingly come from a small handful of regions and families with a history of military service. (You can include my own family in that ever rarer number: My brother is a retired Army captain who served in Iraq.)

With ever-inflating military spending — just over $1 trillion, according to one estimate — the footprint of the US military is hardly shrinking, but the number of those who will potentially be called on to give what Abraham Lincoln called the “last full measure of devotion” is.

Yet there’s a greater gap embedded in Memorial Day: It’s between those who died as warfighters (to use one of the Pentagon’s terms), and the far greater number around the world who have died not as war’s participants, but as its victims. 

And this year, the gap hits differently. Memorial Day 2026 falls even as the United States is still enmeshed in a war it helped start. The conflict with Iran has killed thousands of people across the region in less than two months of fighting. The Human Rights Activists News Agency documented at least 1,701 Iranian civilian deaths, the majority of them caused by US and Israeli airstrikes.

On the war’s first day, a US Tomahawk missile strike on the Shajareh Tayyebeh elementary school in Iran’s Hormozgan province killed 156 people, including 120 students and 26 teachers, according to the preliminary findings of an investigation. More than 3,000 civilians died in neighboring Lebanon over the same period. Among the casualties across the Gulf were migrant delivery workers killed by debris from intercepted Iranian missiles.

At least 13 American service members have been killed so far during the war. They will be remembered this Memorial Day. The Iranian schoolchildren will not.

When civilians die in war

The past is not just a foreign country to us, but a bloody one. From the interpersonal to the international, conflict was a constant throughout much of human history. Between 1500 and 1800, there was hardly a year when great powers weren’t enmeshed in some kind of war. 

Though war became somewhat less common as we entered the 1900s, it did not become less deadly. Far from it — while the death toll of war in the past was more chiefly concentrated among combatants, the 20th century saw the awful blossoming of total war, where little to no distinction was made between those fighting the war and the civilians on the sidelines, and new weapons enabled mass, indiscriminate killing.

Go back to the Civil War, which sits at the junction between battle as it had long been practiced and the greater horror it would become. Over 600,000 soldiers were killed in the conflict, against at least 50,000 civilians, ranging from those killed directly to the many who died in the wake of war, from starvation and disease. 

That number was terrible, yet in the wars to come, it would only grow.

In the First World War, a roughly equal number of combatants and civilians were killed globally — approximately 10 million on each side. In the Second World War, more combatants were killed than in any other conflict in human history, a toll nearing 15 million. Yet for every soldier, sailor, or airman who was killed, nearly one and a half civilians would die, totaling, by one count, almost 40 million. 

The last of the dead would come in Hiroshima and Nagasaki, when as many as 210,000 people — nearly all of them Japanese civilians — died in the first and so far only atomic bombings. Not only were these new weapons capable of murdering at a vastly larger scale than ever before, but they existed chiefly to threaten the lives of noncombatants. 

Thankfully, given the weapons militaries now had at their disposal, World War II was the high mark for war deaths. In the decades that followed, deaths in battle for both combatants and civilians sharply declined, minus the occasional spike in conflicts like the Korean and Vietnam wars. Even with the recent resurgence of conflict, people around the world today are much less likely to die in war than their ancestors, which is one of the most undeniable — if tenuous — markers of our species’ under-appreciated progress.

Yet even in this era of comparative peace, civilians still bear the brunt of war when it comes, including when it is fought by the United States. According to Brown University’s Costs of War project, more civilians were likely directly killed in post-9/11 conflicts than fighters on either side — and when the number of indirect deaths from starvation and destruction are included, that gulf only widens. 

In Ukraine, at least 12,910 civilians have been killed in the war as of March 31, including nearly 700 children, while nearly 31,000 civilians have been injured. In a single large-scale Russian missile attack on April 24, at least nine civilians were killed and 90 were injured, including 12 children.

In Ukraine, the UN has now verified at least 15,850 civilian deaths, including 791 children, since Russia’s 2022 invasion. The first four months of 2026 saw more civilians killed in Ukraine than the same period in any of the past three years, and April alone recorded the highest monthly toll since July 2025: 238 killed and 1,404 injured, with Russian missiles and drones doing most of the damage in cities far from the front.

In Gaza, the documented death toll has climbed past 72,000 according to the Gaza Health Ministry, with more than 172,000 wounded. A population-representative survey published in The Lancet earlier this year validated the ministry’s methodology and estimated that 3 to 4 percent of Gaza’s prewar population has now been killed violently. Add in indirect deaths from starvation, disease, and the collapse of medical infrastructure, and some estimates exceed 100,000. Of course, Israel itself has lost over 1,000 civilians in the October 7 attacks and in the fighting that has followed.

And the ongoing war in Sudan — which has received only a fraction of the global attention of Ukraine and Gaza — has led to horrifying levels of civilian death. Last year Tom Perriello, then the US envoy for Sudan, estimated that at least 150,000 people had died of war-related causes, while 13 million people have been forced to flee their homes.

And the war in Sudan, which has received only a fraction of the global attention of Ukraine and Gaza, has now entered its fourth year, with around 9 million Sudanese still displaced from their homes. Estimates of war-related deaths range from 150,000 to 400,000, and the UN now reports that drone strikes have become the leading cause of civilian death in the conflict, accounting for more than 80 percent of civilian fatalities in the first four months of 2026.

A new kind of Memorial Day

The United States has its Memorial Day to honor fallen soldiers, while other countries have their Remembrance Day, their Victory Day. Yet there are only a handful of monuments to honor the countlessly greater number of civilians killed in war.

It’s not hard to imagine why. As the shift in perception around the Vietnam Veterans Memorial has shown — from unpatriotic atrocity to a celebrated work of national mourning — we can honor the sacrifice of service members who died in a war, even if we don’t believe in the war. But the death of those who died without a rifle in hand, who died in childhood and infancy, who died because they could not fight and could not be protected, shows war for what it ultimately is: a waste. And we can’t begin to know how to mark the unmarked.

America has been a historical exception in many ways, but perhaps no more so than that its civilian citizens have largely escaped the scourge of war. (Though the same, of course, can hardly be said for its Indigenous populations, so long treated as enemy combatants in their own land.) Americans have fought and Americans have died, but at an ever-increasing remove, a distance that grows with each Memorial Day. 

The general decline of war is one of our great accomplishments as humans, something to be unequivocally celebrated. Perhaps we would feel that more if we gave the deaths of civilians the same honor as that of soldiers — a new kind of Memorial Day that can begin here.

 A version of this story was initially published in the Future Perfect newsletter. Sign up here to subscribe!

Update, May 25, 2026, 8 am ET: This story was originally published on May 31, 2023, has been updated to include new data on civilian deaths in Gaza, Iran, Israel, Lebanon, Sudan, and Ukraine, among other countries.

Trump said in a social media post that he made the move after a breakthrough in negotiations, and that significant points under discussion "have been brought to the highest level of Iranian leadership and approved."

EXCLUSIVE: Rai Cinema is getting behind a feature inspired by a real-life operation involving Italian intelligence, elite special forces and the Foreign Ministry’s Crisis Unit to evacuate Palestinian children wounded in air strikes from the war-torn territory. The cinema arm of Italy’s state broadcaster is joining forces with Rome-based MasiFilm on the production, working titled […]

NEW DELHI, June 3 — India approved a 100 billion ‌rupee (RM4.1 billion) fuel stabilisation fund today to help keep jet fuel prices in check for airlines hit by rising costs from the Iran war.

The government said the support would be provided as interest-free advances ‌to oil marketing companies ⁠to cover under-recoveries — the ⁠gap between ⁠market-linked jet fuel prices and ⁠the ⁠moderated rates charged to airlines.

“The measure will help protect ⁠and sustain domestic and international air connectivity, ensuring continuity of air services,” it added.

Shares of India’s largest airline, IndiGo, reversed course ⁠to trade up 1 per cent.

Globally, airlines have been squeezed by rising ⁠jet fuel prices, which can account for ⁠up ⁠to 40 per cent of operating costs. — Reuters

 

Nearly seven in 10 Americans want the Iran war to be done “as quickly as possible,” according to a new poll. In The Economist/YouGov poll, 68 percent of respondents said they believe the U.S. “should make a deal to end the war in Iran as quickly as possible,” while 11 percent disagreed. Twenty-one percent were...

Iran fired ballistic missiles and drones toward Bahrain and Kuwait that were intercepted early Saturday, Bahrain's government said, and called on Tehran to halt attacks on Gulf neighbors that test a fragile ceasefire in the Middle East conflict.

Kuwait briefly shut its main airport Wednesday after Iranian drones heavily damaged a passenger terminal, killed one person and wounded dozens — the latest in back-and-forth attacks by Iran and the U.S. that test a fragile ceasefire.

Spiking energy prices sent inflation to a three-year high in May, up 4.2% annually. The Labor Department said the cost of energy was responsible for over 60% of the increase. Core inflation, which strips out volatile food and energy prices, was up a more modest 2.9%. Geoff Bennett discussed more with Roben Farzad of Full Disclosure.

Exiled Russian director Andrey Zvyagintsev has expressed his pleasure at being back at the Cannes Film Festival with Palme d’Or contender Minotaur after a near decade absence . “It’s one of the greatest things that’s happened to me over these last nine years. Coming back after such a lengthy absence to the Cannes Film Festival […]

In a statement posted to social media, U.S. Central Command said the strikes would be "a proportional response to unjustified Iranian aggression."