Building long-term wealth in Indian equities does not require constant trading; it requires studying businesses carefully and holding with patience. When you learn how to identify multibagger stocks early in their journey, you are better placed to hold them for longer periods.

This guide walks through key filters that experienced investors often use, so that you can evaluate companies in a structured way and avoid decisions based only on market noise.

What is a Multibagger Stock?

Multibagger stocks are a share that multiplies an investor's original capital over many years, usually because the underlying business keeps expanding its sales, profits, and cash flows. Such shares tend to belong to companies that reinvest at attractive returns, widen their reach, and steadily improve their financial strength, rather than relying on short-term price movements driven by rumours and sentiment.

Strong Business Model and Scalable Opportunity

Before looking at ratios, it helps to understand how the company makes money and whether that opportunity can reasonably support growth for several years.

● Large and growing addressable market, so the business has enough room to grow for many years.

● Diversified customer base, with limited dependence on one or two large clients.

● Evidence that profitability improves as the company scales, instead of margins shrinking at higher volumes.

Revenue and Earnings Growth Consistency

Potential long-term wealth creators usually show steady growth in both the top line and the bottom line, rather than a single spike that fades away.

● Focus on multi-year growth in revenue and profit after tax, instead of judging the company on one strong quarter.

● Study whether the growth comes mainly from the core business, not from one-off gains or other irregular income.

● Track how the company performs across weak periods in the economy as well as good years.

● Rather than reacting to every market move, such as recently observed changes in the Suzlon Energy share price, many investors focus on whether earnings and cash flows are improving steadily over time.

High Return Ratios and Capital Efficiency

Strong wealth creators generate solid returns on every rupee they keep in the business, while remaining disciplined in capital allocation.

● Look for companies with a healthy and reasonably stable return on equity over multiple years.

● Check return on capital employed to see how efficiently both debt and equity are being used.

● Compare these returns with the company's cost of capital; higher and more durable spreads are usually considered favourable.

● See if reported profits broadly match the cash generated from the business over time.

Competitive Advantage (Economic Moat)

For a share price to grow several times over, the company usually needs an edge that competitors find difficult to copy.

● Cost advantage built through efficient processes, superior sourcing or better technology that allows competitive pricing with reasonable margins.

● Intangible strengths such as a trusted brand, a wide distribution network or strong dealer relationships.

● Products or services that are deeply integrated into how customers run their business make it inconvenient to switch to another supplier.

● Benefits from network effects or high entry barriers, including regulation or large upfront capital requirements.

Quality Management and Corporate Governance

Management behaviour often decides whether growth turns into wealth for shareholders.

● Promoters and senior leaders with a clean record, avoiding repeated controversies and regulatory issues.

● Sensible promoter shareholding, without excessive pledging of shares to raise short-term funds.

● Capital allocation that appears balanced between growth, debt reduction, and dividends.

● Independent directors and reputed auditors, with related party transactions disclosed in sufficient detail.

Balance Sheet Strength and Financial Discipline

A strong balance sheet helps a company survive difficult periods and still invest when others are forced to slow down.

● Moderate leverage so that interest obligations do not dominate cash flows.

● Preference for long-term funding at a reasonable cost rather than constantly rolling over short-term borrowing.

● Limited dependence on frequent equity dilution, which can reduce the ownership percentage of existing shareholders.

Valuation: Growth Vs Price

Even with potential multibagger stocks, the return for a shareholder depends on the price paid for that growth.

● Compare valuation measures, such as the price-to-earnings and price-to-book ratios, with the company's historical performance and with those of other companies in the same sector.

● Ask whether the expected earnings growth justifies the current valuation, instead of assuming that a high multiple will always continue.

● Be careful with sudden sharp rises in the share price when the price moves far ahead of the company's financial performance.

● Leaving a margin of safety can help reduce the impact if future growth turns out lower than expected.

Conclusion

Selecting potential multibagger stocks is not about quick predictions; it is about building a repeatable way of examining companies. By focusing on business strength, consistency of growth, capital efficiency, competitive position, governance standards, financial discipline and sensible valuation, Indian investors can study opportunities with greater clarity.

This is an advertorial. The article is published as received.

Most people dealing with hair fall start by buying a new shampoo. That's usually the first move, and often the least effective one. The truth is, hair fall is rarely about the shampoo you're using or skipping. It's almost always a signal that something deeper is off, either in your body, your habits, or both. Building a hair care routine that actually reduces hair fall means understanding what's causing it first, and then building around that.

Why Hair Fall Happens in the First Place

Hair fall isn't random. Every strand goes through a natural growth cycle - a growing phase, a resting phase, and a shedding phase. When something disrupts this cycle, you start losing more hair than your body can replace. Common triggers include nutritional deficiencies (especially iron, vitamin D, and protein), chronic stress, hormonal imbalances, scalp conditions like dandruff or seborrheic dermatitis, and poor sleep. Genetics also play a role, particularly in pattern hair loss. The tricky part is that symptoms often show up three to six months after the actual cause, which is why most people can't connect the dots between what they were going through and the hair fall they're seeing now.

Getting Your Scalp Health Right

The scalp is where hair actually lives. If the scalp environment is unhealthy - too oily, too dry, inflamed, or clogged, hair growth suffers regardless of what else you do. A basic but effective approach:

• Wash your hair two to three times a week, not daily. Daily washing strips natural oils and can irritate the scalp.

• Use a gentle, sulfate-free shampoo suited to your scalp type (oily, dry, or normal).

• Don't scratch aggressively with nails. Use fingertip pressure when massaging.

• If you have visible dandruff or itchiness, treat the scalp condition directly before focusing on anything else.

Scalp oiling can be helpful, but it's not a cure-all. Light oils like coconut or sesame, applied an hour before washing, can reduce dryness and improve circulation. Leaving heavy oils on overnight, especially on an already oily scalp can sometimes make things worse.

Building a Routine That Doesn't Damage Hair

A big portion of hair fall is actually mechanical, caused by things you do every day. Heat tools, tight hairstyles, rough towel drying, and combing wet hair all cause physical stress to the strand. Over time, this leads to breakage that looks exactly like hair fall.

• Let hair air dry when possible, or use a low-heat setting.

• Detangle with a wide-tooth comb, starting from the ends upward.

• Avoid tying hair too tight, especially when it's wet.

• Change your cotton pillowcase for a satin or silk one - it reduces overnight friction significantly.

These aren't dramatic changes, but done consistently, they reduce the mechanical load on your hair considerably.

The Role of Nutrition and Internal Health

No topical product can compensate for a body that's nutritionally deficient. Hair is made of keratin, a protein, and it needs adequate protein, iron, zinc, biotin, and vitamins like D and B12 to grow properly. If your diet is restrictive, you've recently gone through a crash diet, or you've been under significant stress, that will show up in your hair within months.

A practical approach is to focus on whole foods - eggs, legumes, leafy greens, nuts, and seeds, before jumping to supplements. Supplements can help, but they should address a confirmed deficiency, not just be taken on assumption.

When to Look at Root Cause Treatment

If hair fall has been going on for more than three months despite basic care, it's worth looking at what's actually driving it. Some treatment approaches, like Traya, focus specifically on identifying the root cause through a health assessment before recommending any intervention. This kind of structured approach tends to be more useful than trying products randomly, because the fix has to match the actual problem, whether that's hormonal, nutritional, stress-related, or scalp-specific.

A good hair care routine is less about doing ten things and more about doing the right few things consistently. Protect your scalp, reduce physical damage, eat well, and take hair fall seriously if it's persistent. Hair responds slowly, most changes take two to three months to show results, so patience matters as much as the routine itself. The goal isn't perfect hair overnight. It's creating conditions where your hair can actually grow without being constantly disrupted.

This is an advertorial. The article is published as received.

Iranian foreign minister Seyed Abbas Araghchi and Russian foreign minister Sergey Lavrov will attend the BRICS Foreign Ministers’ meeting in New Delhi on 14-15 May as India prepares to host a diplomatically sensitive gathering overshadowed by divisions within the bloc over the ongoing West Asia conflict.

However, Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi will skip the meeting because of high-level talks in Beijing involving visiting US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping. China is expected to be represented by Ambassador Xu Feihong.

The meeting, hosted by External Affairs Minister S. Jaishankar, comes at a time when the expanded 11-member BRICS bloc has struggled to arrive at a common position on the war in West Asia.

The grouping now includes Iran, Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates — countries directly affected by the conflict and holding sharply differing strategic positions.

No consensus on West Asia conflict

India, which currently chairs BRICS, was unable to secure consensus language on the conflict during previous consultations.

Instead of a joint statement, New Delhi had issued a Chair’s Summary on 24 April noting that member states had expressed “deep concern” over the conflict and offered differing assessments of the situation.

In March, Tehran had reportedly urged India to issue a BRICS statement condemning US and Israeli strikes on Iran, placing New Delhi in a difficult diplomatic position as it has so far avoided publicly siding with any party in the conflict.

Sources said Araghchi and Lavrov, along with other visiting BRICS representatives, are also expected to meet Prime Minister Narendra Modi before he departs on a multi-nation foreign visit covering the UAE and several European countries.

Strait of Hormuz, evacuation likely on agenda

This will be Araghchi’s first visit to India since the outbreak of the war on 28 February following US and Israeli strikes on Iran.

Discussions between India and Iran are expected to focus heavily on the security situation in West Asia, including disruptions around the Strait of Hormuz.

While 11 Indian ships have reportedly managed to transit the strait and reach India, around 13 vessels remain stranded in the region.

India has also been coordinating with Iranian authorities regarding evacuation of Indian nationals. According to official sources, the Indian Embassy in Tehran has facilitated the movement of more than 2,500 Indian citizens out of Iran through land-border evacuation routes.

India faces diplomatic tightrope

The BRICS grouping now includes Brazil, Russia, India, China, South Africa, Egypt, Ethiopia, Iran, Saudi Arabia, the UAE and Indonesia.

With Iran on one side of the conflict and Gulf states hosting US military assets on the other, India’s role as chair has become increasingly delicate.

Apart from the West Asia crisis, the foreign ministers are expected to discuss multilateralism, reform of global institutions and the future of a multipolar international order amid growing geopolitical tensions linked to Trump’s return to the White House.

India is scheduled to host the BRICS leaders’ summit later this year as part of its 2026 rotational presidency of the bloc.

Sharad Pawar has written an open letter to Prime Minister Narendra Modi expressing concern over the Centre’s recent austerity appeal and demanding that an all-party meeting be convened to discuss the emerging economic situation and its implications.

Pawar, a former defence minister and former agriculture minister, wrote the letter on X two days after Modi appealed to citizens to conserve fuel, avoid foreign travel and postpone gold purchases in view of rising global energy prices and pressure on foreign exchange reserves caused by the continuing West Asia conflict.

The letter was issued ahead of Modi’s proposed five-day foreign tour from 15 to 20 May, during which he is expected to visit the United Arab Emirates, Netherlands, Sweden, Norway and Italy.

Pawar urged Modi to personally chair an all-party meeting on the issue, saying decisions involving national economic concerns should be taken after consultations with opposition parties, economists and experts.

He said the Prime Minister’s appeal asking citizens to reduce fuel consumption, avoid gold purchases and limit foreign travel had created “unease and anxiety” among ordinary people, industry and investors.

Pawar also expressed concern over the possibility of shortages of fuel and other essential resources because of the worsening situation in West Asia and criticised what he described as sudden announcements with potentially long-term economic consequences.

The Nationalist Congress Party (Sharad Pawar faction) leader said the government should take expert advice before implementing major economic measures and stressed that consensus-building on issues affecting the national economy was in the country’s larger interest.

Raj Thackeray attacks Centre’s policies

Raj Thackeray, chief of the Maharashtra Navnirman Sena, also criticised Modi’s appeal in a separate letter posted on X.

Questioning the Centre’s policies, Thackeray asked why citizens should bear the burden of policy failures and suggested that the government should convene a special session of Parliament to discuss the economic situation.

BJP leaders draw criticism over ‘mixed signals’

The austerity appeal has also triggered criticism over alleged contradictions within the ruling Bharatiya Janata Party.

Mumbai BJP president Amit Satam came under attack after undertaking a nala inspection tour with a convoy of around 25 vehicles, prompting opposition parties to accuse the BJP of double standards on fuel conservation.

Varsha Gaikwad of the Indian National Congress shared videos of the convoy on social media and criticised what she described as continuing “VIP culture” despite calls for austerity.

Meanwhile, the Maharashtra Government has begun implementing a series of cost-cutting measures following Modi’s remarks.

The office of Maharashtra Assembly Speaker has cancelled a proposed Japan visit by 12 MLAs, while the state government has decided not to send any official delegation to the Cannes Film Festival in France.

Under the new guidelines, ministers will now require prior approval from Chief Minister Devendra Fadnavis before using government aircraft, chartered planes or helicopters, and officials have been encouraged to conduct meetings online.

BJP MLA Pravin Darekar has also reportedly booked an electric vehicle following Modi’s appeal, amid indications that governments may increasingly promote EV adoption as part of fuel conservation measures.

Has anything changed in Indian wrestling ever since the trio of Sakshi Malik, Vinesh Phogat and Bajrang Punia took to the streets at Jantar Mantar in 2023, seeking removal of Brij Bhushan Singh — the then tainted president of WFI (Wrestling Federation of India)?

A sense of déjà vu has gripped followers of the sport as Vinesh, who plans to make a comeback after her retirement following the heartbreak of Paris 2024, was ruled ‘ineligible’ from taking part in the Asian Games trials at the National Open Ranking Tournament in Gonda, Uttar Pradesh on Monday.

The event could have seen the first competitive bout for Vinesh, now 31, who had left Paris in tears after being found ‘overweight’ by 100 grams in the weigh-in ahead of the final bout – with at least a silver assured to boost a flagging Indian campaign at the Games.

However, the WFI found her reply to their showcause (issued barely two days back) on issues  ranging from her Paris Olympics disqualification to missed anti-doping whereabouts filings and alleged technical violations during trials, ‘inadequate’ and have barred her from taking part in the ongoing Gonda event.

No wonder that the timing of the showcause, so close to the date of the trials which could have paved the route for her comeback in the international arena, is being seen as a deliberate ploy by the wrestler to scuttle her dreams.

Taking to her X handle, the former bronze medallist at World Championships says: ‘’I have been given written permission by the ITA (International Testing Agency) to compete from 1 Jan, 2026, I was allowed to register for the 2026 Senior Open Ranking Tournament at Nandini Nagar, Gonda on the 28th of April, 2026. I came to Gonda today to participate but I have neither been allowed to complete my verification, nor been allowed to use the training hall here. I don’t want any special privileges, I just want to compete on merit.’’

She had also posted a PDF of the email of the ITA communication to her (dated 3 July, 2025), marked to world governing body as well, which says Vinesh is eligible to participate in competitive events from the start of the year. The six-month embargo from ITA for participation was because of the fact Vinesh had missed one of the three ‘whereabouts’ call-ups from the agency for a dope test and hence a six-month hiatus would be required before she could take to the mat again.

Speaking to media after her disqualification in Gonda, Vinesh clarified: “I had missed one whereabouts. And there are three of them. I had become a mother at that time. I also had an assembly session which I forgot to update. I even apologised to WADA for that. They gave me a clean chit. They told me that I can participate in any international event.”

 Calling the showcause notice a ‘pre-planned conspiracy,’ Vinesh alleged that the timing was deliberately chosen to leave her with little legal recourse before the tournament. ‘’I got the notice on Friday night, on Saturday I was reducing weight and doing paperwork. They knew exactly when to send the notice, when courts would be closed and when filing would become difficult. This is all pre-planned,’’ alleged Vinesh, now a Congress MLA from Julana in Haryana.

The conspiracy theory behind the entire controversy gains credence from the fact that Vinesh – alongwith Olympic medallists Sakshi Malik and Bajrang Punia – had proved to be a bete noire for Brij Bhushan who is still believed to running the show in WFI despite stepping down for their elections.

Speaking to National Herald in a phone call, Anita Sheoran, a 2010 Commonwealth Games gold medallist who ran for presidency against the current incumbent Sanjay Singh, said:  ‘’It’s an open secret that Brij Bhushan’s words are still the law in WFI and Sanjay is a shadow candidate. I agreed to contest the elections in the hope if we could make wrestling a safer place for the girls, but I am not sure if much has changed.’’

Asked whether Anita sees any vendetta in the manner Vinesh is being treated, the former champion said: ‘’The Asian Games is only in the second half of September, so why do you need to hold the trials so early in the year? Normally, it’s never held at least before June-July but then the current dispensation does it on their free will. This would have helped Vinesh complete the so-called WFI rule of a six month embargo as per their anti-doping rules.’’

Meanwhile, Sakshi Malik — who had been conspicuously silent since the days of protest — joined issue with her fellow wrestler. In a carefully worded video, the Rio 2016 bronze medallist said while many countries would ‘relax’ rules to help women athletes continue with their careers, ‘’But our federation has come up with rules to stop Vinesh from making a comeback.’’

 Meanwhile, Brij Bhushan claimed that he has no role in wrestling body’s decisions now. The former WFI chief, who attended a hearing in the sexual harassment case against him at the capital’s Rouse Avenue Court on Tuesday, told the media: ‘’I am currently cleaning up the mess that this lady has left behind. Furthermore, the question of where a wrestling match will or will not take place does not concern me. That subject currently falls under the purview of the WFI.’’

VINESH VS WFI? A TIMELINE

August 2024: Paris exit

Vinesh is disqualified from the women’s 50kg gold medal bout at the Paris Olympics for failing to make weight and retires the next day.

December 2024: WFI flags retirement

WFI cites UWW communication confirming Vinesh had informed the ITA of her retirement. Her husband disputes this, saying no formal procedure was followed.

December 2025: Vinesh comeback plans

Vinesh notifies UWW, SAI, and WFI of her comeback. WFI simultaneously flags a missed whereabouts filing from December 18. Vinesh says WADA reviewed it and gave her a clean chit.

1 January, 2026: International clearance granted

The ITA officially clears Vinesh to resume training and competition — a date she says WFI has deliberately ‘misrepresented’ as 26 June, 2026.

May 9, 2026: WFI showcause

Two days before the Gonda tournament, WFI issued a showcause notice charging her with anti-doping violations, breach of return-to-competition procedure.

May 11, 2026: Barred from trials

Vinesh arrives to compete but is denied verification and training hall access. She addressed the media, made X posts and says she will fight back with the Asian Games in her sights.

Mayawati on Tuesday said Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s recent appeal for austerity and fuel conservation reflected a deepening economic crisis in the country that extends beyond rising petroleum prices.

In a post on X, the Bahujan Samaj Party chief referred to Modi’s appeal made amid the ongoing conflict in West Asia and said the Prime Minister’s remarks indicated broader economic stress linked to foreign exchange pressures and rising fuel costs.

“This proves that the crisis confronting India is not limited merely to petroleum products such as petrol, diesel and cooking gas; rather, an economic crisis is also set to deepen,” Mayawati said.

She added that the economic situation was already affecting millions of Indians and warned that the hardships could continue in the coming months.

“In other words, at a time when nearly 100 crore citizens of the country, having already faced the severe blow of the COVID-19 era, are struggling even to secure their daily livelihood, there is nothing left of any significance to lose or to be more restrained about,” she said.

The BSP leader urged both the Centre and state governments to take proactive measures to support economically weaker sections and provide relief to poor and working-class families.

“Under these circumstances, the central and state governments should take proactive measures to provide some relief and support to these poor and hardworking families,” she said, adding that such steps would be in the interest of both the people and the country.

Modi had urged fuel conservation

Modi, while addressing a BJP rally in Hyderabad on Sunday, had called for judicious fuel consumption and conservation of foreign exchange in view of the continuing conflict in West Asia and its impact on global crude oil and fertiliser prices.

The Prime Minister urged citizens to reduce petrol and diesel usage, prefer metro rail services, adopt carpooling, increase use of electric vehicles and utilise railway freight services wherever possible.

He also appealed to people to postpone foreign travel and gold purchases for one year in order to conserve foreign exchange reserves.

“We have to save foreign exchange by any means,” Modi had said, while also encouraging greater use of work-from-home arrangements, virtual meetings and video conferencing methods that became common during the Covid-19 pandemic.

The remarks came amid sharp increases in global crude oil prices triggered by geopolitical tensions in West Asia, raising concerns over inflationary pressure and India’s import bill.

In what is being seen as the first major political fallout of the TVK’s spectacular rise in Tamil Nadu politics, a faction of the AIADMK led by SP Velumani and CV Shanmugam on Tuesday extended support to the Vijay-led ruling coalition in the state.

Although the rebel leaders denied that the AIADMK — founded by former chief minister and iconic actor M.G. Ramachandran (MGR) — had formally split, multiple media reports suggested that the party was facing a deep internal vertical divide over support to the TVK government.

According to the AIADMK faction, party chief Edappadi K. Palaniswami retained the support of only around 20-22 legislators, while most MLAs favoured extending support to the Vijay-led government in the interest of political stability.

TVK emerged as the single largest party in the Assembly elections, winning 108 seats in the 234-member House, but fell 10 short of the majority mark. The Congress extended support with five MLAs, but intense political negotiations continued over securing the remaining numbers needed to form the government.

It was during this phase that the Shanmugam-led AIADMK faction — which claims the backing of 47 legislators — pushed for supporting the TVK government.

Shanmugam, who is expected to join the Vijay government, pointed to the AIADMK’s repeated electoral setbacks as a key reason behind the rebellion. He said the party had suffered three successive defeats at the hands of the DMK and that its alliance with the BJP had failed to revive its fortunes. Since the death of former chief minister J. Jayalalithaa, he said, the party had been grappling with a prolonged leadership and organisational crisis.

“We need to revive the party and discuss its future. We urge the General Secretary to convene the party council,” Shanmugam said, while also criticising sections within the AIADMK for exploring an understanding with the DMK.

At the same time, he insisted that he had no intention of splitting the AIADMK, setting the stage for a dramatic confrontation with the party’s leadership led by EPS, who had earlier rejected calls from the rebel faction to support Vijay and the TVK.

Shanmugam also declared that the AIADMK’s alliance with the BJP revived by EPS last year in an attempt to regain political ground was effectively over. The development is politically significant as Vijay had repeatedly cited the AIADMK’s ties with the BJP as a major ideological obstacle to any alliance.

Meanwhile, another group of senior AIADMK leaders considered loyal to EPS, including KP Munusamy and Thambidurai, met Palaniswami at his residence amid the escalating crisis.

The AIADMK’s IT wing also attacked the rebel leaders on X, branding them “betrayers” and accusing them of being incapable of winning seats in their own districts. “It is EPS who protects the party. People voted for the AIADMK only because of EPS,” the post said.

The political drama follows reports last week that several AIADMK legislators loyal to EPS had been shifted to a resort in Puducherry amid pressure from within the party to support the TVK government. Leaders close to EPS denied reports of a rebellion and claimed the move was aimed at preventing poaching attempts by rival camps.

A bench of the Calcutta High Court headed by justice Rajasekhar Mantha on Tuesday recused itself from hearing matters related to the rape and murder of a woman doctor at RG Kar Medical College and Hospital, citing an excessive workload and lack of sufficient time to dedicate to the sensitive case.

While stepping aside, the bench observed that there was a surplus of pending matters before the court and noted that, in the interest of justice, the case should be heard by a bench capable of devoting adequate time and attention to the proceedings.

The development comes amid indications that the West Bengal government may constitute a judicial commission in connection with the case.

During Tuesday’s proceedings, the court accepted a status report submitted by the Central Bureau of Investigation, which is currently probing the matter following directions from the High Court.

At an earlier hearing, Justice Mantha’s bench had clarified that the CBI was free to interrogate the convicted accused as well as any other suspects if required to further the investigation.

“The CBI can interrogate any person to take the investigation forward,” the bench had observed, following which the central agency submitted its updated report.

This is not the first time a bench has withdrawn from hearing the matter. In March 2025, a division bench headed by Justice Debangshu Basak also recused itself from hearing the petition filed by the victim’s family, citing an inability to allocate sufficient time for detailed proceedings. The victim’s family had sought an expedited hearing but the matter could not proceed fully before that bench.

The case relates to the recovery of the woman doctor’s body from RG Kar Medical College and Hospital on 9 August 2024, triggering nationwide outrage and protests over women’s safety and conditions in public hospitals.

A day after the incident, civic volunteer Sanjay Roy was arrested by the Kolkata Police. The investigation was later transferred to the CBI on the orders of the Calcutta High Court.

On 18 January 2025, a court in Sealdah found Roy guilty in the case, and two days later Judge Anirban Das sentenced him to life imprisonment.

However, even before the trial court delivered its verdict, the victim’s parents had approached the High Court raising questions over the CBI probe and seeking further investigation into possible larger conspiracies and additional suspects.

The petition was initially placed before Justice Tirthankar Ghosh, who declined to hear the matter, noting that proceedings related to the RG Kar case were also underway in the Supreme Court of India.

The victim’s family subsequently moved the Supreme Court. During the hearing, then chief justice Sanjiv Khanna questioned why the same plea should be heard simultaneously in multiple courts and directed that the matter be pursued before the high court.

The case has since continued before different benches of the Calcutta High Court, with the victim’s family continuing to seek answers regarding the scope and direction of the investigation.

With IANS inputs

A year after Operation Sindoor, the Narendra Modi government of India still describes it as proof of a new doctrine, a signal that terrorism traced to Pakistan will invite punishment across borders. That claim has political force. Yet wars are not judged by intent alone.

They are judged by the balance they leave behind. By that measure, Operation Sindoor looks less like a strategic success than a costly misadventure that exposed the limits of India’s military and diplomatic power, revived Pakistan’s relevance, and gave China an unexpected advertisement for its weapons.

The operation began after the Pahalgam massacre of April 2025, in which twenty-six civilians were killed in Kashmir. India immediately blamed Pakistan-linked militants and struck targets across Pakistan and Pakistan administered Kashmir on the night of 6 and 7 May.

New Delhi intended to hit terror infrastructure, keep escalation below the nuclear threshold, and demonstrate that the old restraint after major terror attacks had ended. In that narrow sense, the strike achieved visibility. It showed that India was willing to use force in the heartland of Pakistan despite nuclear risks. But the battlefield quickly slipped beyond the neat script of calibrated punishment.

Pakistan responded militarily and, more importantly, survived and succeeded politically, diplomatically, and psychologically. Before the conflict, India enjoyed not just a larger economy and a larger military, but also a deeply entrenched perception of conventional superiority.

That perception mattered. It shaped diplomacy, deterrence, media narratives, and Pakistan’s own sense of vulnerability. Operation Sindoor punctured it. Whether Pakistan shot down two, five, or more Indian aircraft remains contested.

But even limited confirmation from India’s senior military officials and several outside officials that Chinese made Pakistani aircraft brought down Indian jets, including at least one Rafale, was enough to alter the strategic conversation. A country presumed to be outmatched had shown it could impose visible costs.

This is the central military lesson India should not evade. Conventional superiority is not a slogan. It must be proven across sensors, missiles, electronic warfare, command networks, quality of fighter jets, pilot training, and information discipline.

India may have hit Pakistani air bases and military infrastructure later in the conflict. It may have adapted after initial losses and used long range precision weapons effectively. But in modern conflict, the first images and first claims shape the global story. India’s silence created a vacuum. Pakistan filled it.

China amplified it. The world noticed not India’s declared punitive precision, but the possibility that Chinese platforms and Pakistani tactics had successfully challenged India’s airpower.

Pakistan did not need to prove every claim beyond doubt. It needed only to cast doubt on India’s presumed air dominance. Operation Sindoor therefore did not establish uncontested asymmetry, as BJP supporters argue. It revealed contested asymmetry.

India remains militarily stronger in arithmetic aggregation, but Pakistan demonstrated that strength on paper can be blunted by new weapons, networking, Chinese support, long range missiles, and a carefully managed escalation strategy.

The diplomatic consequences have been no less uncomfortable for India. Washington was closer to India, the Gulf was more pragmatic, and Islamabad was weighed down by debt, political instability, and insurgency. After Sindoor, Pakistan did not become powerful, but it became useful again.

Donald Trump repeatedly claimed credit for the ceasefire, publicly inserted himself into the crisis, and treated Pakistan’s army chief Asim Munir as a consequential interlocutor. For India, which insists that Kashmir and India-Pakistan tensions are bilateral matters, this was a diplomatic setback. The crisis meant to show India’s action reopened space for outside mediation talk.

Munir gained from this. Pakistan’s army, battered by domestic criticism before the conflict, recast itself as the defender that had stood up to India. The general’s global profile rose, especially in Washington’s highly personalized diplomacy under Trump. Pakistan also positioned itself as a useful actor in the West Asia and around Iran and Gulf security. This may not be a durable strategic revival, but it weakened India’s claim that Pakistan no longer matters. Modi wanted to punish Pakistan. He helped Rawalpindi recover attention it had lost.

The China angle is even more consequential. Pakistan has long depended on Chinese arms, but Operation Sindoor has deepened the military and intelligence fusion between the two. China provided Pakistan with real time support and used the crisis as a live laboratory for its weapons against Indian systems.

For Beijing, this was low-cost strategic learning. It did not have to fight India directly. It could watch Indian responses, test Chinese platforms, assess Western aircraft, and gather lessons for a possible future conflict in the Himalayas or the Indo Pacific.

For China’s defence industry, the gains were immediate. The J-10C entered global debate not as an untested Chinese fighter but as an aircraft associated with combat success against India and its French fighter jets. AVIC Chengdu’s revenues and share prices surged, and interest in Chinese aircraft grew among states seeking cheaper and reliable alternatives to Western systems.

Even if Pakistan’s claims were inflated, perception did the work. Defence markets are shaped by narrative as well as performance. A single contested battle can become a sales pitch. India, by launching an operation that allowed Pakistan and China to showcase their systems, unintentionally boosted the prestige of the military ecosystem it should be trying to contain.

This does not mean India should have ignored Pahalgam. No government can remain passive after such a cold-blooded massacre. The question is not whether India had a right to respond. The question is whether Modi’s chosen highly-politicised response improved India’s security.

A punitive strike that triggers aircraft losses, strengthens Pakistan’s military narrative, draws Trump into mediation claims, deepens China-Pakistan cooperation, and raises Chinese fighter stocks is not a clean success. It is a warning about the difference between tactical action and strategic outcome.

The deeper danger is that both India and Pakistan may now believe escalation can be managed. India has announced a new normal in which terrorism will be treated as an act of war. Pakistan believes rapid retaliation can internationalise the crisis and force intervention.

Both sides have learned that drones, missiles, standoff weapons, and information warfare can be used under the nuclear shadow. It lowers the threshold for the next confrontation and compresses decision time for leaders already trapped by domestic divisive nationalism.

Operation Sindoor should therefore be remembered not as a triumphant doctrine but as a stress test India failed to fully control. It exposed serious gaps in intelligence, air combat preparedness, strategic communication, and diplomatic anticipation.

It showed that China is not a distant third party but an active force multiplier. It showed that Washington under Trump cannot be assumed to privilege Indian sensitivities over Pakistani utility. Above all, it showed that performative toughness can produce strategic embarrassment.

A year later, the ceasefire holds, but little else does. The Indus Waters Treaty remains suspended, diplomacy is frozen, and public opinion on both sides has become more militarized. Modi wanted Operation Sindoor to announce India’s arrival as an unrestrained regional power. Instead, it revealed a harsher truth.

Power is not measured by the bravado to strike first. It is measured by the ability to shape what happens after. On that front, Modi’s misadventure gave Pakistan a narrative, China a market, Trump a stage, and South Asia a more dangerous future.

Ashok Swain is a professor of peace and conflict research at Uppsala University, Sweden. More by the author here

British Prime Minister Keir Starmer was on Tuesday consulting senior colleagues over his political future amid a widening rebellion within the ruling Labour Party, with reports suggesting several cabinet ministers and nearly 80 lawmakers want him to announce a timeline for stepping down.

The political crisis has erupted less than two years after Labour’s sweeping parliamentary victory, following the party’s poor performance in last week’s local elections and mounting dissatisfaction within its ranks over Starmer’s leadership.

According to British media reports, senior ministers including Home Secretary Shabana Mahmood and Foreign Secretary Yvette Cooper have privately urged Starmer to clarify when he intends to leave office in order to pave the way for a leadership contest.

Almost 80 Labour MPs from across ideological factions within the party have reportedly demanded that Starmer announce a departure timetable.

Senior minister Darren Jones said Starmer was speaking to colleagues and weighing his options ahead of a crucial cabinet meeting.

“He’s listening to colleagues, and he’s talking to colleagues. I can’t get ahead of any decision he may or may not take,” Jones told Times Radio.

The pressure on Starmer intensified despite his attempt on Monday to stabilise his position by pledging to govern with greater urgency and boldness in response to Britain’s economic and social challenges.

However, sections of Labour’s parliamentary party openly renewed calls for his resignation soon after the speech, deepening uncertainty around the government’s stability and contributing to a rise in British borrowing costs.

Starmer had warned that another Labour leadership contest could damage the party and revive the political instability that marked British politics in the years following the country’s decision to leave the European Union in the 2016 Brexit referendum.

Britain has already had four prime ministers in the past five years.

The latest turmoil comes just a day before King Charles III is scheduled to formally outline the government’s legislative agenda during the traditional State Opening of Parliament ceremony on Wednesday.

The National Testing Agency (NTA) on Tuesday cancelled the NEET-UG 2026 examination conducted on 3 May following allegations of a paper leak and other irregularities, with the Union government ordering a comprehensive investigation by the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI).

The examination, held for admission to undergraduate medical courses across the country, will now be conducted again on dates that are yet to be announced.

In a statement issued on X, the NTA said the decision had been taken after reviewing inputs received in coordination with central agencies and findings shared by law enforcement authorities.

According to the agency, the material gathered during the preliminary inquiry indicated that the integrity of the existing examination process had been compromised, making it impossible for the results to stand.

The NTA said the cancellation and re-conduct of the examination had been approved by the Government of India in order to preserve transparency and maintain public confidence in the national examination system.

The agency also confirmed that the matter had been formally referred to the CBI for a detailed investigation into the alleged irregularities linked to the examination process.

The NTA said it would extend full cooperation to the central agency and provide all necessary documents, records and logistical support required for the inquiry.

Acknowledging the disruption caused to students and their families, the agency said the decision to cancel the examination had not been taken lightly but was necessary to avoid long-term damage to the credibility of the testing system.

The agency clarified that candidates who had registered for the May 2026 examination would not need to apply again. Existing registration details, candidature records and examination centre preferences would automatically be carried forward for the fresh examination cycle.

It also announced that no additional examination fee would be charged and that fees already paid by students would be refunded. The re-conducted examination, the agency said, would be organised using the NTA’s internal resources.

Fresh dates for the examination and the revised admit card schedule are expected to be announced through official channels in the coming days.

The NTA urged students and parents to rely only on verified updates released by the agency and avoid misinformation circulating online.

The development comes days after the NTA publicly defended the conduct of the examination, stating that strict security protocols had been followed during the May 3 test. According to the agency, question papers were transported in GPS-enabled vehicles carrying traceable watermark identifiers, while examination centres were monitored through AI-assisted CCTV surveillance from a central control room.

The agency had earlier stated that information regarding suspected malpractice was received on the evening of 7 May, four days after the examination, and was subsequently escalated to central authorities for independent verification and further action.

With PTI inputs

Olympic bronze medallist Sakshi Malik has strongly backed fellow wrestler Vinesh Phogat amid the ongoing row over her eligibility, urging Prime Minister Narendra Modi, Sports Minister Mansukh Mandaviya and the Wrestling Federation of India to allow her to compete and make an international comeback.

Vinesh, who announced her retirement shortly after her dramatic disqualification from the Paris Olympics 2024, later reversed her decision after becoming a mother last year and has been attempting to return to competitive wrestling after nearly 20 months away from the sport.

However, in a 15-page show-cause notice, the Wrestling Federation of India declared Vinesh “ineligible” to participate in sanctioned competitions until at least 26 June 2026. The decision effectively bars her from competing in the 2026 Senior Open Ranking Tournament in Gonda, Uttar Pradesh.

Backing Vinesh publicly, Sakshi appealed to authorities to permit the wrestler to take part in trials.

“I request my Prime Minister Narendra Modi, sports minister Mansukh Mandaviya, and the Wrestling Federation to take Vinesh’s trials so that she can also win medals for the country and make the country proud,” Sakshi said.

She further said Vinesh’s return could become an important example for women athletes balancing motherhood and professional sport.

“And to set such an example, so that women can play in their own country, even after becoming a mother, win medals and make the country proud,” she added.

Sakshi also criticised the federation’s handling of the issue, arguing that many international sports bodies actively support female athletes returning after childbirth.

“I can give many such examples where sports federations of other countries make rules easier for their players so that even after becoming a mother, women can play for the country and win medals,” she said in a video posted on social media.

“Whereas our federation implements such rules two days before so that Vinesh cannot make a comeback,” Sakshi alleged.

Despite being declared ineligible, Vinesh appeared at the Senior National Open Ranking Tournament in Gonda and maintained that both the International Testing Agency and the World Anti-Doping Agency had cleared her to return to competition from 1 January 2026.

The controversy has sparked wider debate within Indian sports over athlete welfare, federation transparency and support mechanisms for women athletes returning to elite competition after motherhood.

With IANS inputs