To pass a FISA reauthorization, Johnson needs to stop governing by crisis and finally allow votes on real privacy reforms. 

KUALA LUMPUR, June 12 — Umno Youth chief Datuk Dr Muhamad Akmal Saleh has filed a judicial review application challenging the Attorney General’s decision to prosecute him over a Facebook post allegedly capable of causing public fear.

The application was filed at the High Court Penang on February 27 and is scheduled for hearing on June 16, according to his lawyers Messrs Aizat Izuan Shakeel, Harian Metro reported yesterday.

In a statement, the firm said the case goes beyond Akmal’s personal circumstances and raises broader constitutional and systemic issues.

“This application is not merely about one individual, but about the principle that justice must not only be done, but must be seen to be done fairly for all Malaysians without exception,” the lawyers were quoted as saying.

The legal team said the application raises questions over alleged selective prosecution, inconsistent treatment in similar cases, and whether the charge complies with Article 8 of the Federal Constitution on equality before the law.

They also argued that freedom of speech, while protected under the Constitution, must still operate within legal limits.

“Such perceptions, if left unaddressed, could erode public confidence in the principles of justice that underpin the nation’s legal system,” they said, referring to concerns over inconsistent enforcement.

Dr Akmal’s lawyers said he would continue to respect the judicial process and leave it to the court to decide on the issues raised.

The Merlimau assemblyman was charged at the Magistrates’ Court in Bukit Mertajam on August 22 last year over a Facebook post dated August 11 that was alleged to have caused public alarm.

He pleaded not guilty under Section 505(b) of the Penal Code, which provides for a maximum penalty of two years’ jail, a fine, or both upon conviction.

 

The jury box is one of the few places in modern American life where citizens are asked to do something genuinely difficult together.

President Trump granted a pardon this week to a former Republican lawmaker who was convicted of insider trading for using nonpublic information to buy stocks after leaving office, according to the White House. A June 4 proclamation stated that ex-Rep. Stephen Buyer (R-Ind.) would receive a “full, complete, and unconditional pardon” without explanation. It notes...

JUNE 2 — Our own great constitutionalist, Prof Dr Shad Saleem Faruqi explains the Rukun Negara in the following paragraphs.

The Rukun Negara are five stirring objectives of our nation: unity; a democratic way of life; a just society where the prosperity of the country can be enjoyed together in a fair and equitable manner; a liberal approach towards our rich and varied cultural traditions; and a progressive society that will make use of science and modern technology.

Supporting the objectives are five transcendental ideals: belief in God; loyalty to king and country; supremacy of the Constitution; rule of law; and courtesy and morality.

Launched by the then Yang di–Pertuan Agong on Aug 31, 1970, and like the Pancasila of Indonesia, the Rukun Negara was meant to be the sail and anchor of our nation and its guiding philosophy.

Unfortunately, it could not be presented to Parliament because the Emergency Proclamation of May 15, 1969, had sent Parliament into dissolution. Regrettably also, the Rukun Negara has not become the guiding light it was meant to be.

Lip service is paid to the Rukun Negara in all schools. It is honoured but hardly observed and emulated.

The above explains why it remains one of his two fervent hopes that the Rukun Negara could be incorporated into our Federal Constitution as a stirring Preamble to our supreme law.

If you wonder why, Prof Faruqi explains in the following paragraphs.

The Rukun Negara distills the essence of our Constitution. Its principle of “Supremacy of the Constitution” replicates Articles 4(1) and 162(6) of the Constitution. “Belief in God” is honoured in Articles 3 and 11. “Loyalty to King and country” is required by innumerable provisions, including Articles 32-38.

“Rule of law” is implied in provisions for judicial review of governmental action in Articles 4, 121 and 128. “Democratic way of life” is promoted by innumerable provisions conferring personal liberties in Articles 5 to 13 and providing for elected and representative assemblies at both federal and state levels in Articles 44-49, 71-72, and 113-119.

“Rich and varied cultural traditions” are protected by provisions for freedom of religion in Article 11 and freedom of speech, assembly and association in Article 10. The right to use vernacular and native languages is protected by Article 152. Malay and native customs are safeguarded even in times of emergency under Article 150(6A).

“Morality” is safeguarded by empowering Parliament in Articles 10 and 11 to enact laws to safeguard morality.

The special rights of Sabah and Sarawak in our federal set-up are entrenched in about 30 Articles of the Constitution.

I particularly like it when Prof Faruqi describes the Rukun Negara as “distilling” the essence of the Federal Constitution.

So, if one is a citizen of the country by reason of Part III of the Federal Constitution (Articles 14-22) – mind you, there can’t be any other reason – but rejects the Rukun Negara, then His Majesty Sultan Ibrahim, King of Malaysia, is right.

He or she is not worthy of being regarded as a Malaysian citizen.

* This is the personal opinion of the writer or publication and does not necessarily represent the views of Malay Mail.