Normal view

Noida police ‘criminalising trade union activity’, says IFTU; calls it an attack on constitutional rights

28 April 2026 at 14:36

The Indian Federation of Trade Unions (IFTU) has accused the Noida police of “criminalising trade union activity” under the guise of investigating recent industrial unrest, calling it a direct assault on the fundamental rights guaranteed by the Constitution.

The labour body alleged that the police is attempting to delegitimise and suppress legitimate trade union activity. “The right to organise workers, to make them aware of their legal rights, and even to struggle for their demands are all guaranteed by the Constitution of India,” the IFTU said.

Criticising a recent court order, the IFTU said that an ACJM court in Gautam Budh Nagar had permitted the police to access electronic devices, including mobile phones, of three activists—Satyem, Aditya Anand and Himanshu Thakur—and examine their interactions with workers and organisational material.

“In the name of investigating the April 13 violence, the court has accepted the flawed position of the police, allowing access not just to the activists’ devices but potentially to any worker who may have been in contact with them at any point,” it said.

The union body argued that the order overlooks settled legal principles upheld in previous judgments that workers have the right to organise, unionise, collectively raise demands and engage in collective bargaining.

The 13 April protests in Noida saw thousands of factory workers take to the streets demanding wage hikes, during which alleged violence was reported. Following the unrest, police arrested between 350 and 396 people.

Protests demanding wage hikes and fixed work hours turned violent in India's industrial hub of Noida after factory workers torched vehicles and pelted stones, leading to a showdown with police. Read more: https://t.co/1TKaGWzYNO pic.twitter.com/EsrtEaUAAc

— Reuters (@Reuters) April 13, 2026

Notably, under mounting pressure after the protests, the Yogi government ensured the disbursal of over ₹1 crore in pending wages under the Minimum Wages Act and announced an interim hike of ₹2,000 in minimum wages. It also initiated action against contractors, filed charges against 50 of them, cancelled licences of 10 and blacklisted several others.

Demanding the withdrawal of all FIRs, release of those arrested, strict implementation of labour laws, repeal of the four Labour Codes, and a nationwide minimum wage of ₹30,000, the IFTU said: “The four Labour Codes being enforced by the Central government weaken labour law enforcement mechanisms and curtail trade union rights, particularly through the Industrial Relations Code. The actions of the Noida police are furthering this agenda.”

Noida—one of the NCR’s most heavily industrialised hubs—home to nearly 15,000 registered units spread across three police zones. These include everything from small-scale enterprises to multinational firms, together representing over two lakh business entities and employing an estimated four lakh workers.

To 'prevent' any protest in the future, the Gautam Budh Nagar Police Commissionerate has formed a dedicated industrial cell and appointed an ad hoc Deputy Commissioner of Police to oversee industrial affairs.

  • ✇National Herald
  • Sisodia declines to pursue case before Delhi HC judge after Kejriwal’s move NH Political Bureau
    A political and legal standoff has intensified in the ongoing Delhi excise policy case, with senior Aam Aadmi Party leaders Arvind Kejriwal and Manish Sisodia refusing to participate in proceedings before Justice Swarana Kanta Sharma of the Delhi High Court.On Tuesday, Sisodia wrote to the judge stating that he would not pursue his matter in the excise case in her court and would not appoint legal representation. His remarks echoed a similar stance taken by Kejriwal a day earlier, when the Delhi
     

Sisodia declines to pursue case before Delhi HC judge after Kejriwal’s move

28 April 2026 at 05:22

A political and legal standoff has intensified in the ongoing Delhi excise policy case, with senior Aam Aadmi Party leaders Arvind Kejriwal and Manish Sisodia refusing to participate in proceedings before Justice Swarana Kanta Sharma of the Delhi High Court.

On Tuesday, Sisodia wrote to the judge stating that he would not pursue his matter in the excise case in her court and would not appoint legal representation. His remarks echoed a similar stance taken by Kejriwal a day earlier, when the Delhi chief minister said he would neither appear in person nor engage a lawyer for his case before the same bench.

In his letter, Sisodia made sharp comments, saying he did not expect justice and that there was “no path left except Satyagraha”, signalling a shift towards symbolic protest. He also made a pointed reference to Tushar Mehta, suggesting that the future of the judge’s children lay in the hands of the senior law officer.

The confrontation follows the rejection of a joint plea filed by Kejriwal, Sisodia and other accused seeking the recusal of Justice Sharma from hearing excise policy-related matters. In a detailed order delivered on 20 April, the judge dismissed the request, describing it as a strategic attempt and asserting that recusal cannot be based on perceptions or external pressure.

"I have no hope of justice," says AAP leader Manish Sisodia in his letter to Justice Swarana Kanta Sharma, stating that no lawyer will appear before her on his behalf.
"There is no way left except Satyagraha," Sisodia adds, after AAP National convenor Arvind Kejriwal boycotted… pic.twitter.com/53tY63EHnL

— ANI (@ANI) April 28, 2026

The excise policy case centres on allegations of corruption, including claims of policy manipulation and kickbacks linked to Delhi’s now-scrapped 2021–22 liquor policy. Investigations by central agencies have focused on several AAP leaders and intermediaries.

Justice Sharma has been hearing multiple petitions and bail applications connected to the case and has, in several instances, ruled in favour of the prosecution. The defence had argued that repeated adverse rulings created a reasonable apprehension of bias, a claim the court firmly rejected.

Following the court’s decision, both Kejriwal and Sisodia have chosen to disengage from proceedings before her bench, framing their move as a matter of principle rather than legal strategy. The AAP has portrayed the developments as evidence of political targeting and has questioned whether a fair trial is possible under the current circumstances.

However, legal observers and sections of the bar have raised concerns over the implications of such non-cooperation. Refusing to appear in court or appoint counsel could be seen as undermining judicial authority, with some warning that continued defiance may invite contempt proceedings if it disrupts the judicial process.

The episode marks a significant escalation in the dispute between the AAP leadership and the judiciary, blending legal contest with political messaging. As the excise policy case continues to unfold, the refusal of two of its most prominent accused to participate in court proceedings adds a new and uncertain dimension to an already high-profile matter.

With PTI inputs

  • ✇National Herald
  • Farooq Abdullah reiterates push for Article 370 restoration, statehood for J&K NH Political Bureau
    National Conference (NC) leader Farooq Abdullah has reaffirmed that restoring Article 370 remains central to the agenda of the Jammu and Kashmir NC, declaring there would be no compromise on the issue.Speaking at a public gathering in Budgam in central Kashmir on Monday, the veteran leader said the party would continue its campaign to safeguard the rights and dignity of the people of Jammu and Kashmir. He emphasised that the demand for reinstating Article 370, revoked by the Centre in 2019, rema
     

Farooq Abdullah reiterates push for Article 370 restoration, statehood for J&K

28 April 2026 at 05:04

National Conference (NC) leader Farooq Abdullah has reaffirmed that restoring Article 370 remains central to the agenda of the Jammu and Kashmir NC, declaring there would be no compromise on the issue.

Speaking at a public gathering in Budgam in central Kashmir on Monday, the veteran leader said the party would continue its campaign to safeguard the rights and dignity of the people of Jammu and Kashmir. He emphasised that the demand for reinstating Article 370, revoked by the Centre in 2019, remained non-negotiable.

Abdullah also addressed concerns around governance in the Union Territory, stating that a dual administrative system would not serve its long-term stability. He argued that an elected government must be allowed to function without undue interference, warning that parallel authority structures could create confusion and hinder decision-making.

Highlighting the party’s legacy, he credited the leadership of Sheikh Abdullah with ushering in transformative land reforms that granted ownership rights to farmers and significantly reduced poverty and inequality.

According to Abdullah, these measures played a crucial role in reshaping the region’s socio-economic landscape.

He alleged that the constitutional safeguards once enjoyed by Jammu and Kashmir had been steadily weakened over time before being entirely removed in 2019. He also criticised the role of the Jammu and Kashmir People's Democratic Party in that process.

Reiterating his party’s position, Abdullah cautioned against what he described as misleading narratives and insisted that the struggle for restoring constitutional rights would continue under all circumstances.

The former chief minister also renewed calls for the restoration of full statehood to Jammu and Kashmir, arguing that it is essential for effective governance. He noted that assurances had previously been given by Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Home minister Amit Shah regarding statehood, but said progress had yet to materialise.

Abdullah added that the Supreme Court of India had also directed the Centre to expedite the process, and urged the government to honour its commitments without further delay.

With PTI inputs

  • ✇National Herald
  • EC orders swift police action over offensive post targeting Mamata Banerjee NH Political Bureau
    The Election Commission of India (ECI) has directed police to take immediate and stern action over an objectionable social media post allegedly targeting West Bengal chief minister Mamata Banerjee, officials said on Monday.The controversy erupted after the All India Trinamool Congress flagged a “vile, insulting and highly objectionable” caricature of the chief minister, purportedly shared online by a self-described right-wing supporter from Uttar Pradesh. The party said the post was taken down f
     

EC orders swift police action over offensive post targeting Mamata Banerjee

28 April 2026 at 03:58

The Election Commission of India (ECI) has directed police to take immediate and stern action over an objectionable social media post allegedly targeting West Bengal chief minister Mamata Banerjee, officials said on Monday.

The controversy erupted after the All India Trinamool Congress flagged a “vile, insulting and highly objectionable” caricature of the chief minister, purportedly shared online by a self-described right-wing supporter from Uttar Pradesh. The party said the post was taken down following a formal complaint.

Taking serious note of the incident, an EC official confirmed that law enforcement agencies have been instructed to act without delay.
“We have taken serious note of it and instructed the police to initiate immediate action. Necessary directions have been issued to ensure prompt response,” the official said.

Separately, TMC member Nilanjan Das lodged a complaint with the cybercrime unit of the Bidhannagar Police, triggering a formal investigation.

Police said the social media account responsible for the post is under scrutiny as part of the probe.

The development comes at a crucial juncture in the state’s electoral calendar. West Bengal is set to vote in the second phase for 142 seats on Wednesday, following the first phase held on 23 April. Counting of votes is scheduled for 4 May.

With PTI inputs

❌